| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Carpocalypse
Fewer cars but each car spends much more time on the road.
Maybe this could be the end of driveways: https://www.businessinsider.com/carp...-europe-2019-3 |
Carpocalypse
On 05/03/2019 05:03, Bret Cahill wrote:
Fewer cars but each car spends much more time on the road. Maybe this could be the end of driveways: https://www.businessinsider.com/carp...-europe-2019-3 They keep wringing their hands over it but the chart shows production fall against a few good years; it's probably just a return to trend. Since cars last a long time, I am sure the population of cars must still be rising. |
Carpocalypse
On Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:21:12 GMT, TMS320 wrote:
On 05/03/2019 05:03, Bret Cahill wrote: Fewer cars but each car spends much more time on the road. Maybe this could be the end of driveways: https://www.businessinsider.com/carp...bile-sales-dat a-us-europe-2019-3 They keep wringing their hands over it but the chart shows production fall against a few good years; it's probably just a return to trend. Since cars last a long time, I am sure the population of cars must still be rising. I doubt it'll slow down global warming a jot. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
Carpocalypse
On Tuesday, 5 March 2019 20:07:05 UTC, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:21:12 GMT, TMS320 wrote: On 05/03/2019 05:03, Bret Cahill wrote: Fewer cars but each car spends much more time on the road. Maybe this could be the end of driveways: https://www.businessinsider.com/carp...bile-sales-dat a-us-europe-2019-3 They keep wringing their hands over it but the chart shows production fall against a few good years; it's probably just a return to trend. Since cars last a long time, I am sure the population of cars must still be rising. I doubt it'll slow down global warming a jot. Who cares. I will be dead long before this has any effect and as an atheist I wont be in any position to care. |
Carpocalypse
|
Carpocalypse
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 8:38:13 PM UTC, GB wrote:
On 05/03/2019 20:25, wrote: Who cares. I will be dead long before this has any effect and as an atheist I wont be in any position to care. Isn't that a psychopathic attitude? You'll foul up the only planet we have to live on because it won't affect you? Don't you feel any responsibility to others at all? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqZsoesa55w |
Carpocalypse
On 05/03/2019 20:38, GB wrote:
On 05/03/2019 20:25, wrote: Who cares. I will be dead long before this has any effect and as an atheist I wont be in any position to care. Isn't that a psychopathic attitude? You'll foul up the only planet we have to live on because it won't affect you? Don't you feel any responsibility to others at all? He didn't say he didn't care whilst he is alive, just stating the fact that when he's dead he couldn't do anything about it anyway. -- Bod --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Carpocalypse
On 06/03/2019 09:07, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:21:12 GMT, TMS320 wrote: On 05/03/2019 05:03, Bret Cahill wrote: Fewer cars but each car spends much more time on the road. Maybe this could be the end of driveways: https://www.businessinsider.com/carp...bile-sales-dat a-us-europe-2019-3 They keep wringing their hands over it but the chart shows production fall against a few good years; it's probably just a return to trend. Since cars last a long time, I am sure the population of cars must still be rising. I doubt it'll slow down global warming a jot. Correct. To slow down global warming we must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere by over 80%. Meanwhile the population of the world is now nearly 8B and is increasing at 1-2% pa. While this goes on any reduction in greenhouse gas emissions simply will not happen - all those teeming millions in Africa, Asia and other places will want their increase in standard of living. The only thing that will work is a big reduction in the world's population of humans. This will happen anyway. Whether it be through war or pestilence or some more humane means is really up to us. |
Carpocalypse
On 06/03/2019 07:37, Bod wrote:
On 05/03/2019 20:38, GB wrote: On 05/03/2019 20:25, wrote: Who cares. I will be dead long before this has any effect and as an atheist I wont be in any position to care. Isn't that a psychopathic attitude? You'll foul up the only planet we have to live on because it won't affect you? Don't you feel any responsibility to others at all? He didn't say he didn't care whilst he is alive, just stating the fact that when he's dead he couldn't do anything about it anyway. He starts off by saying "Who cares", though. |
Carpocalypse
On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 07:37:23 UTC, Bod wrote:
On 05/03/2019 20:38, GB wrote: On 05/03/2019 20:25, wrote: Who cares. I will be dead long before this has any effect and as an atheist I wont be in any position to care. Isn't that a psychopathic attitude? You'll foul up the only planet we have to live on because it won't affect you? Don't you feel any responsibility to others at all? He didn't say he didn't care whilst he is alive, just stating the fact that when he's dead he couldn't do anything about it anyway. He? |
Carpocalypse
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 8:07:05 PM UTC, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
I doubt it'll slow down global warming a jot. Indeed, climate change is Gods' punishment for our lax abortion laws. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn8_wCGd80g&t=2s |
Carpocalypse
On Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:38:10 -0000, GB wrote:
On 05/03/2019 20:25, wrote: Who cares. I will be dead long before this has any effect and as an atheist I wont be in any position to care. Isn't that a psychopathic attitude? You'll foul up the only planet we have to live on because it won't affect you? Don't you feel any responsibility to others at all? Since global warming is utter bull****, no. |
Carpocalypse
On Tue, 05 Mar 2019 05:03:08 -0000, Bret Cahill wrote:
Fewer cars but each car spends much more time on the road. Maybe this could be the end of driveways: https://www.businessinsider.com/carp...-europe-2019-3 Cars last longer now. That article is utter ****e. Everyone I know and everyone I see has more and more cars. But unfortunately not more and more driveway space. FFS people, if you own 3 cars, have a 3 car driveway. Can't we simply have a law stating that a car may not be permanently housed on a public road? Cars should only park on roads when you're a taxi picking someone up, or you're stopping at a shop. |
Carpocalypse
On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. |
Carpocalypse
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote: Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. And whether it matters. So some countries get better crops, some get worse, who cares? The climate has always and will always change. See "ice age" on google. It's not the end of the world, just like a bit of wind isn't. I've got a severe weather warning here and my shed hasn't even blown down. |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 +0000, TMS320, the mentally deficient,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered: Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. ....and the first troll-feeding senile idiot appeared who couldn't resist taking the Scottish attention whore's latest idiotic bait! BG |
Carpocalypse
On 12/03/2019 23:33, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote: Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. And whether it matters.* So some countries get better crops, some get worse, who cares? People that have nothing to eat will. When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made. The climate has always and will always change.* See "ice age" on google. It's not the end of the world, just like a bit of wind isn't. I've got a severe weather warning here and my shed hasn't even blown down. Weather and climate are different things. This insignificant little island doesn't have severe weather. It's amazing how worked up we get about a bit of drizzle. |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:42:56 +0000, TMS320, the mentally deficient,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered: People that have nothing to eat will. People who have no brains at all will fall for the Scottish ******'s absolutely idiotic baits, senile idiot! tsk |
Carpocalypse
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:42:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 12/03/2019 23:33, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote: Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. And whether it matters. So some countries get better crops, some get worse, who cares? People that have nothing to eat will. When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made. Utter ****ing bull****. Russia could get warm enough to grow crops where they currently can't for example. Deserts could become wetter and grow crops. You're just pulling things out of thin air. The climate has always and will always change. See "ice age" on google. It's not the end of the world, just like a bit of wind isn't. I've got a severe weather warning here and my shed hasn't even blown down. Weather and climate are different things. But we can't predict either of them. This insignificant little island doesn't have severe weather. It's amazing how worked up we get about a bit of drizzle. It's amazing how people all over the world get worked up about a change that would have happened without our intervention anyway. You never know, what if it cancels out an ice age and saves us? |
Carpocalypse
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:42:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 12/03/2019 23:33, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote: Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. And whether it matters. So some countries get better crops, some get worse, who cares? People that have nothing to eat will. When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made. The climate has always and will always change. See "ice age" on google. It's not the end of the world, just like a bit of wind isn't. I've got a severe weather warning here and my shed hasn't even blown down. Weather and climate are different things. This insignificant little island doesn't have severe weather. It's amazing how worked up we get about a bit of drizzle. Think about it this way, what are we doing which the alarmists think will cause climate change? We're burning fossil fuels, that's putting carbon from the ground back into the atmosphere, so it's just like it was before coal and oil were deposited. Where did that coal and oil come from? Dead plants and animals - therefore there must have been plants and animals before the coal and oil existed. So we'll live just like they did, in a ****ing paradise with higher CO2 levels which makes abundant crops. Anyway it doesn't really matter what your ****ed up opinion is, we WILL burn all the fossil fuels, it cannot be stopped, so you might aswell top yourself now. |
Carpocalypse
On 13/03/2019 16:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:42:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 23:33, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote: Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. And whether it matters.* So some countries get better crops, some get worse, who cares? People that have nothing to eat will. When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made. Utter ****ing bull****. I only suggested what will happen when/if we wipe ourselves out. People talk about "saving the planet". That is the bull**** bit - the planet will save itself. Russia could get warm enough to grow crops where they currently can't for example.* Deserts could become wetter and grow crops.* You're just pulling things out of thin air. It might... or might not. The climate has always and will always change.* See "ice age" on google. It's not the end of the world, just like a bit of wind isn't. I've got a severe weather warning here and my shed hasn't even blown down. Weather and climate are different things. But we can't predict either of them. One is daily local fluctuations, the other is a world trend over decades and centuries. It is easier to make predictions from trends. This insignificant little island doesn't have severe weather. It's amazing how worked up we get about a bit of drizzle. It's amazing how people all over the world get worked up about a change that would have happened without our intervention anyway.* You never know, what if it cancels out an ice age and saves us? You never know... or do you? Two possibilities: things work out well for us or they don't work out well. Analysis is more likely to achieve the first outcome than sticking your fingers in your ears. |
Carpocalypse
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:01:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/03/2019 16:24, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:42:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 23:33, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote: Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. And whether it matters. So some countries get better crops, some get worse, who cares? People that have nothing to eat will. When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made. Utter ****ing bull****. I only suggested what will happen when/if we wipe ourselves out. People talk about "saving the planet". That is the bull**** bit - the planet will save itself. Now you're being pedantic, either for comic effect or because you're stupid. Russia could get warm enough to grow crops where they currently can't for example. Deserts could become wetter and grow crops. You're just pulling things out of thin air. It might... or might not. Every place will change one way or another, if it changes at all. There will be places to grow crops, but not necessarily in the same countries. So only a political problem then. The climate has always and will always change. See "ice age" on google. It's not the end of the world, just like a bit of wind isn't. I've got a severe weather warning here and my shed hasn't even blown down. Weather and climate are different things. But we can't predict either of them. One is daily local fluctuations, the other is a world trend over decades and centuries. It is easier to make predictions from trends. It might be easier to try, but it's not easier to get it right. Statisticians seemed to have made you believe their religion. This insignificant little island doesn't have severe weather. It's amazing how worked up we get about a bit of drizzle. It's amazing how people all over the world get worked up about a change that would have happened without our intervention anyway. You never know, what if it cancels out an ice age and saves us? You never know... or do you? Two possibilities: things work out well for us or they don't work out well. Analysis is more likely to achieve the first outcome than sticking your fingers in your ears. Analysis is a waste of time and money. The climate will do whatever it does, we adapt to whatever it does. We already have people living in countries with VASTLY different climates. They all manage just fine. |
Carpocalypse
On 13/03/2019 16:31, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:42:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 23:33, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote: Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. And whether it matters. So some countries get better crops, some get worse, who cares? People that have nothing to eat will. When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made. The climate has always and will always change. See "ice age" on google. It's not the end of the world, just like a bit of wind isn't. I've got a severe weather warning here and my shed hasn't even blown down. Weather and climate are different things. This insignificant little island doesn't have severe weather. It's amazing how worked up we get about a bit of drizzle. Think about it this way, what are we doing which the alarmists think will cause climate change? We're burning fossil fuels, that's putting carbon from the ground back into the atmosphere, so it's just like it was before coal and oil were deposited. Where did that coal and oil come from? Dead plants and animals - therefore there must have been plants and animals before the coal and oil existed. So we'll live just like they did, in a ****ing paradise with higher CO2 levels which makes abundant crops. Anyway it doesn't really matter what your ****ed up opinion is, we WILL burn all the fossil fuels, it cannot be stopped, so you might aswell top yourself now. What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:01:01 +0000, TMS320, an especially retarded,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered: Two possibilities: Yeah: either you suck him off or you don't suck him off! You obviously prefer the first option, you senile sucker of troll cock! |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 +0000, TMS320, an especially retarded,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. LOL! He's ONLY trying to bait you, you senile idiot! And he succeeds EVERY time! |
Carpocalypse
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/03/2019 16:31, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:42:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 23:33, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:30:01 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 12/03/2019 22:59, Commander Kinsey wrote: Since global warming is utter bull****, no. Incorrect. The world is warming. The argument is over whether humans are contributing to it. And whether it matters. So some countries get better crops, some get worse, who cares? People that have nothing to eat will. When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made. The climate has always and will always change. See "ice age" on google. It's not the end of the world, just like a bit of wind isn't. I've got a severe weather warning here and my shed hasn't even blown down. Weather and climate are different things. This insignificant little island doesn't have severe weather. It's amazing how worked up we get about a bit of drizzle. Think about it this way, what are we doing which the alarmists think will cause climate change? We're burning fossil fuels, that's putting carbon from the ground back into the atmosphere, so it's just like it was before coal and oil were deposited. Where did that coal and oil come from? Dead plants and animals - therefore there must have been plants and animals before the coal and oil existed. So we'll live just like they did, in a ****ing paradise with higher CO2 levels which makes abundant crops. Anyway it doesn't really matter what your ****ed up opinion is, we WILL burn all the fossil fuels, it cannot be stopped, so you might aswell top yourself now. What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." |
Carpocalypse
On 13/03/2019 19:27, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. |
Carpocalypse
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:41:42 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 13/03/2019 19:27, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There might be, but it will be negligible compared to the natural cycles. And it won't cause harm since it'll just put us back to where we were - it's common sense. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. But the treehuggers only concentrate on that one, which won't wipe anything out. |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:41:42 +0000, TMS320, an especially retarded,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered: Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. This troll-feeding senile moron STILL doesn't get what's going on! ROTFLOL |
Carpocalypse
On 14/03/2019 00:41, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:41:42 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 13/03/2019 19:27, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There might be, but it will be negligible compared to the natural cycles.* And it won't cause harm since it'll just put us back to where we were - it's common sense. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. But the treehuggers only concentrate on that one, which won't wipe anything out. "it'll just put us back to where we were". But we weren't there. Like many of the modern plants, animals and insects that we rely on. |
Carpocalypse
On 14/03/2019 07:01, TMS320 wrote:
I only suggested what will happen when/if we wipe ourselves out. People talk about "saving the planet". That is the bull**** bit - the planet will save itself. Yes the planet will save itself, probably by wiping out most of the human race through war or pestilence. To make a difference to global warming we have to reduce emissions by over 75%. This will simply not happen if the population is nearly 8B and growing. We have to find a humane way of getting the population of the world to fall to 2B or less Telling everyone to reduce their emissions by 75% by going back to the stone age simply will not happen. |
Carpocalypse
On 14/03/2019 07:06, Commander Kinsey wrote:
because you're stupid. Amazing the way to stoop to personal insults. Why do people insult others? An insult can be interpreted as an attempt to reduce the social status of the recipient and raise the relative status of the insulter. If that logic is correct, we can assume that insults are often motivated by anger surrounding issues of status insecurity. |
Carpocalypse
On 14/03/2019 10:02, Peter Keller wrote:
On 14/03/2019 07:01, TMS320 wrote: I only suggested what will happen when/if we wipe ourselves out. People talk about "saving the planet". That is the bull**** bit - the planet will save itself. Yes the planet will save itself, probably by wiping out most of the human race through war or pestilence. To make a difference to global warming we have to reduce emissions by over 75%. This will simply not happen if the population is nearly 8B and growing. We have to find a humane way of getting the population of the world to fall to 2B or less Telling everyone to reduce their emissions by 75% by going back to the stone age simply will not happen. Yes, some want to think that altering the atmosphere does not have consequences. Even if they try to argue that GW is not one of the consequences. |
Carpocalypse
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:55:25 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/03/2019 00:41, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:41:42 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 13/03/2019 19:27, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There might be, but it will be negligible compared to the natural cycles. And it won't cause harm since it'll just put us back to where we were - it's common sense. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. But the treehuggers only concentrate on that one, which won't wipe anything out. "it'll just put us back to where we were". But we weren't there. Like many of the modern plants, animals and insects that we rely on. You'd be surprised how quickly things adapt. |
Carpocalypse
On 14/03/2019 12:44, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:55:25 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 14/03/2019 00:41, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:41:42 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 13/03/2019 19:27, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There might be, but it will be negligible compared to the natural cycles.* And it won't cause harm since it'll just put us back to where we were - it's common sense. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. But the treehuggers only concentrate on that one, which won't wipe anything out. "it'll just put us back to where we were". But we weren't there. Like many of the modern plants, animals and insects that we rely on. You'd be surprised how quickly things adapt. There are two things in your statement. One is an assumption about me, the other concerns the pace of evolution. Whatever, nothing changes the fact that if we weren't there in the first place the only way it is physically possible to go back there is to turn into compost. That is one remarkably quick adaptation. |
Carpocalypse
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:21:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/03/2019 12:44, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:55:25 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 14/03/2019 00:41, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:41:42 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 13/03/2019 19:27, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There might be, but it will be negligible compared to the natural cycles. And it won't cause harm since it'll just put us back to where we were - it's common sense. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. But the treehuggers only concentrate on that one, which won't wipe anything out. "it'll just put us back to where we were". But we weren't there. Like many of the modern plants, animals and insects that we rely on. You'd be surprised how quickly things adapt. There are two things in your statement. One is an assumption about me, the other concerns the pace of evolution. WTF? I made one statement, that evolution is faster than you think. Whatever, nothing changes the fact that if we weren't there in the first place the only way it is physically possible to go back there is to turn into compost. That is one remarkably quick adaptation. Er no. Animals and plants were both very much alive then, not just compost. |
Carpocalypse
On 14/03/2019 13:29, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:21:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 14/03/2019 12:44, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:55:25 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 14/03/2019 00:41, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:41:42 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 13/03/2019 19:27, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There might be, but it will be negligible compared to the natural cycles.* And it won't cause harm since it'll just put us back to where we were - it's common sense. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. But the treehuggers only concentrate on that one, which won't wipe anything out. "it'll just put us back to where we were". But we weren't there. Like many of the modern plants, animals and insects that we rely on. You'd be surprised how quickly things adapt. There are two things in your statement. One is an assumption about me, the other concerns the pace of evolution. WTF?* I made one statement, that evolution is faster than you think. You have no idea what I think, apart from the words I have written here. Try it, how fast is evolution - in numerical terms. Whatever, nothing changes the fact that if we weren't there in the first place the only way it is physically possible to go back there is to turn into compost. That is one remarkably quick adaptation. Er no.* Animals and plants were both very much alive then, not just compost. Well, gosh... Do you know what compost is? Besides, you specifically mentioned "we". |
Carpocalypse
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:38:40 -0000, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/03/2019 13:29, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:21:56 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 14/03/2019 12:44, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:55:25 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 14/03/2019 00:41, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:41:42 -0000, TMS320 wrote: On 13/03/2019 19:27, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:02:06 -0000, TMS320 wrote: What opinion have I expressed that is in, your opinion, ****ed up? You seem to be trying to be, and failing, a mind reader like Nugent. This: "When we have wiped ourselves out the planet will still be a rock in space and bacteria and fungus will evolve to clean up the mess we made." Very well. You claim there is no warming effect due to human action. It's a point of view. There might be, but it will be negligible compared to the natural cycles. And it won't cause harm since it'll just put us back to where we were - it's common sense. There are many other ways of wiping ourselves out than digging carbon out of the ground. But the treehuggers only concentrate on that one, which won't wipe anything out. "it'll just put us back to where we were". But we weren't there. Like many of the modern plants, animals and insects that we rely on. You'd be surprised how quickly things adapt. There are two things in your statement. One is an assumption about me, the other concerns the pace of evolution. WTF? I made one statement, that evolution is faster than you think. You have no idea what I think, apart from the words I have written here. Try it, how fast is evolution - in numerical terms. You're disagreeing with me, so I know what you think. Whatever, nothing changes the fact that if we weren't there in the first place the only way it is physically possible to go back there is to turn into compost. That is one remarkably quick adaptation. Er no. Animals and plants were both very much alive then, not just compost. Well, gosh... Do you know what compost is? Yes, it's not plants or animals, which were very much alive when all the carbon was in the air where it belongs. Besides, you specifically mentioned "we". Now what are you on about? You're seriously deranged, you seem unable to grasp simple conversation. |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:55:25 +0000, TMS320, an especially retarded,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered: But the treehuggers only concentrate on that one, which won't wipe anything out. "it'll just put us back to where we were". But we weren't there. Like many of the modern plants, animals and insects that we rely on. Troll huggers like you ONLY concentrate on sucking off the filthy Scottish ******, eh, you troll-feeding senile asshole? |
Troll-feeding Senile IDIOT Alert!
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:21:56 +0000, TMS320, an especially retarded,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered: There are two things in your statement. One is an assumption about me, the other concerns the pace of evolution. Nope, troll-feeding senile idiot, there are only TWO things he the one is a trolling sociopathic ****** and the other is you, the troll-feeding senile idiot! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com