CycleBanter.com

CycleBanter.com (http://www.cyclebanter.com/index.php)
-   UK (http://www.cyclebanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars! (http://www.cyclebanter.com/showthread.php?t=223737)

Derek C December 15th 10 10:21 AM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
This from a certain Ian Jackson in urcm:

In article 20101213224910.00673daf@gododdin,
Simon Brooke wrote:


I wouldn't know. Except when I went head first into a cliff I've never
been over the handlebars.



Everyone has seen the video of my front camera falling into the
spokes
and locking up my front wheel at 20+mph ?

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/bikecams/
Top entry "2007-9-15 Crash"


--
Ian Jackson personal email:

These opinions are my own. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/
PGP2 key 1024R/0x23f5addb, fingerprint 5906F687 BD03ACAD 0D8E602E
FCF37657





bugbear December 15th 10 10:53 AM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
"Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative."

Rob Morley December 15th 10 01:40 PM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over thehandlebars!
 
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Derek C wrote:

This from a certain Ian Jackson in urcm:

In article 20101213224910.00673daf@gododdin,
Simon Brooke wrote:


I wouldn't know. Except when I went head first into a cliff I've
never been over the handlebars.



Everyone has seen the video of my front camera falling into the
spokes
and locking up my front wheel at 20+mph ?

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/bikecams/
Top entry "2007-9-15 Crash"

You probably think you have some sort of point, but I have to say
you're not doing a terribly good job of making it.


Paul - xxx[_2_] December 15th 10 02:04 PM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
Derek C wrote:

This


Presumably you have a link to show where IJ, or indeed anyone who rides
regularly, specifically said "cycling is not dangerous and riders never
go over the handlebars" rather than you simply inferring or spinning
what they actually said.

Otherwise, do you have a point?

--
Paul - xxx

JMS December 15th 10 02:23 PM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:21:36 -0800 (PST), Derek C
wrote:

This from a certain Ian Jackson in urcm:

In article 20101213224910.00673daf@gododdin,
Simon Brooke wrote:


I wouldn't know. Except when I went head first into a cliff I've never
been over the handlebars.



Everyone has seen the video of my front camera falling into the
spokes
and locking up my front wheel at 20+mph ?

http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/bikecams/
Top entry "2007-9-15 Crash"




Incredible - what a knob he really is.

Derek C December 15th 10 07:04 PM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
On Dec 15, 2:04*pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
Derek C wrote:
This


Presumably you have a link to show where IJ, or indeed anyone who rides
regularly, specifically said "cycling is not dangerous and riders never
go over the handlebars" rather than you simply inferring or spinning
what they actually said.

Otherwise, do you have a point?

--
Paul - xxx


Several contributors to this group, including Messrs. Chapman and
Ravin, have suggested that cycling is not at all dangerous and
cyclists never go over the handlebars and fall on their heads. Hence
there is no justification for wearing cycle helmets. The official DfT
road accident ststistics show a somewhat different picture, with 38%
of cyclists involved in accidents suffering some degree of head or
facial injury. I myself have suffered such an injury when falling off
a bike.

Cycling is great fun, a practical way of making short local journeys
and keeps you fit. However it is intrinsically more dangerous than
driving a modern car, so in my opinion it is worth taking sensible
precautions such as wearing a decent cycle helmet. I will now sit back
and wait for all the flack from the psycholists.

Derek C

Just zis Guy, you know?[_33_] December 15th 10 08:34 PM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ah yes, that reminds me: you were supposed to provide the message-id
where anyone other than you made the claim that cyclists never go over
the bars.

Here's a space for you:



Off you go, now, there's a good chap.

- --
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.
PGP public key at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNCSZgAAoJEJx9ogI8T+W/4gwH/AxIKEtvT3ruLsDQkxtndn7X
IrKGb9M3ZXhAtdrTWxyA5BcZZj8+pBMlrZCWkImXeBnEiPd8Bq UUOCc84fSwRq90
bEXkRIzEGi7AYKOHD28e5Egi5gVk8VVTMN2rLuvfAzNA4DH2Zh 2Dp4JiF2WIQF8j
w5ft+YHgUW+P73yRib9oOrZXOY7cr54OQAID1GDaImyoYEyu4T 53GZcJyutsU7X7
gdOlTj230R2ydaPhWPDfKyPWSAFfXbKpNmjGz/ZqumysTAwpP1nYb0Zw9hdawF2D
Xd3HuTrlAbaEixQJK3oFabN+EOfuY1Hy3EQMdHv6u7MrfQ7LWk pJA2VqMHIDIY4=
=pC/h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Paul - xxx[_2_] December 15th 10 08:39 PM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
Derek C wrote:

On Dec 15, 2:04*pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
Derek C wrote:
This


Presumably you have a link to show where IJ, or indeed anyone who
rides regularly, specifically said "cycling is not dangerous and
riders never go over the handlebars" rather than you simply
inferring or spinning what they actually said.

Otherwise, do you have a point?


Several contributors to this group, including Messrs. Chapman and
Ravin, have suggested that cycling is not at all dangerous and
cyclists never go over the handlebars and fall on their heads.


So the answer is no, you don't have a link to show where anyone
actually said "cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the
handlebars"

So again, do you have a point?

--
Paul - xxx

Just zis Guy, you know?[_33_] December 15th 10 08:39 PM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 15/12/2010 19:04, Derek C wrote:

Several contributors to this group, including Messrs. Chapman and
Ravin, have suggested that cycling is not at all dangerous and
cyclists never go over the handlebars and fall on their heads. Hence
there is no justification for wearing cycle helmets. The official DfT
road accident ststistics show a somewhat different picture, with 38%
of cyclists involved in accidents suffering some degree of head or
facial injury. I myself have suffered such an injury when falling off
a bike.


You must now prodice the message IDs in which those named said that
cycling is "not at all" dangerous or that cyclists "never go over the
handlebars" or you will have to admit to being a liar. It will be a lie
since you have made this claim before and failed to substantiate it.

Message IDs or you're a liar. Those are the only two options here.

Cycling is great fun, a practical way of making short local journeys
and keeps you fit. However it is intrinsically more dangerous than
driving a modern car, so in my opinion it is worth taking sensible
precautions such as wearing a decent cycle helmet. I will now sit back
and wait for all the flack from the psycholists.


Dangerous to whom? Cycling is intrinsically quite low risk, as we see in
the Netherlands; what risk there is comes mainly from all those people
driving all those modern cars.

We'll leave aside the rather obvious example of begging the question, as
you already know that to be fallacious even though you continue to
assert it.

- --
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.
PGP public key at http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/pgp-public.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNCSeNAAoJEJx9ogI8T+W/v84H/2FW+u9X0nPQSEnSshAuoWh8
cVBhf5u9zKKNaemV0TiHpETC8wAruYqmqxXGTCyVNPL3yis3al qzJTOJo8SD06WC
aLE3IQn525LJkaRvHuySMG4tFB2GoFOnSRWHYlGhg/YUtPeB/3eRd0H1oimzhAod
Xp5JCbp0lR28yXxT3zEX9pfhL5snl1iunhOcEv5epMFb52nucn VQQ2bigVpKgaHF
brYLewNmusbvsia1GU2jO6MIWsx+Ztx/bcO9XvCMRbXP3fr/0VebIKzK+PtVE9mi
QN+rjGi2dh0QBTK7gpsE8nY9LvPO75bL1BBiYaUFCxfdjTQu0s rHV6azxxw7n+s=
=mJpM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Derek C December 15th 10 10:08 PM

Why cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the handlebars!
 
On Dec 15, 8:39*pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
Derek C wrote:
On Dec 15, 2:04*pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
Derek C wrote:
This


Presumably you have a link to show where IJ, or indeed anyone who
rides regularly, specifically said "cycling is not dangerous and
riders never go over the handlebars" rather than you simply
inferring or spinning what they actually said.


Otherwise, do you have a point?


Several contributors to this group, including Messrs. Chapman and
Ravin, have suggested that cycling is not at all dangerous and
cyclists never go over the handlebars and fall on their heads.


So the answer is no, you don't have a link to show where anyone
actually said "cycling is not dangerous and riders never go over the
handlebars"

So again, do you have a point?

--
Paul - xxx/


Yes. In my opinion it is sensible to wear a cycle helmet when riding a
bicycle.

Derek C



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM.
Home - Home - Home - Home - Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com