The Lack Of Effectiveness of Mike Vandeman ("Ph.D"-Hah Hah)
 

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:39:04 -0600, "di" wrote:

.
.just another long worthless rant,

That's what all mountain bikers seem to think of science.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande


Dear Mike,

1) Your hypotheses are flawed, your sources are not scientific, your
conclusions are invalid.
2) Your alleged PhD is ficticious.
3) As defined by your standard footer you are wholly ineffective, a joke
actually.
4) The responses you get here is the only recognition you get in your
life.

Let me guess. Unemployed, living with parents, no adult relationships,
right hand is your best buddy.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:58:22 GMT, "JP" wrote:

..
.."Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
. ..
.. On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:39:04 -0600, "di" wrote:
..
.. .
.. .just another long worthless rant,
..
.. That's what all mountain bikers seem to think of science.
.. ===
.. I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
.. humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
.. years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
..
.. http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
..
..
..Dear Mike,
..
..1) Your hypotheses are flawed, your sources are not scientific, your
..conclusions are invalid.
..2) Your alleged PhD is ficticious.
..3) As defined by your standard footer you are wholly ineffective, a joke
..actually.
..4) The responses you get here is the only recognition you get in your
..life.
..
..Let me guess. Unemployed, living with parents, no adult relationships,
..right hand is your best buddy.

Did you say something?
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...

.Dear Mike,
.
.1) Your hypotheses are flawed, your sources are not scientific, your
.conclusions are invalid.
.2) Your alleged PhD is ficticious.
.3) As defined by your standard footer you are wholly ineffective, a
joke
.actually.
.4) The responses you get here is the only recognition you get in your
.life.
.
.Let me guess. Unemployed, living with parents, no adult relationships,
.right hand is your best buddy.

Did you say something?

Unemployed. Living with parents. No relationships.
Specious arguments, specious credentials.
Pathetic. Anonymous Dysfunctional. Alone.
Yeah, I said you are a loser and a liar.


===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Love the last eight years.
If I were a weapons manufacturer I'd want you working for peace.

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:58:22 GMT, "JP"
wrote:
.
.Dear Mike,
.
.1) Your hypotheses are flawed, your sources are not scientific, your
.conclusions are invalid.
.2) Your alleged PhD is fictitious.
.3) As defined by your standard footer you are wholly ineffective, a
joke
.actually.
.4) The responses you get here is the only recognition you get in your
.life.
.
.Let me guess. Unemployed, living with parents, no adult relationships,
.right hand is your best buddy.

Did you say something?

Yes he did, let me spell it out for you. He suggested that you are a
w@nker, he's probably not alone in that assumption.