CycleBanter.com

CycleBanter.com (http://www.cyclebanter.com/index.php)
-   UK (http://www.cyclebanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Reliable Transport (http://www.cyclebanter.com/showthread.php?t=255266)

Simon Jester December 28th 17 03:48 AM

Reliable Transport
 

I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles.
Why is that?
I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were not.

Mr Pounder Esquire December 28th 17 05:46 PM

Reliable Transport
 
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?



I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were
not.


Just for once you thought correctly.



MrCheerful December 28th 17 06:02 PM

Reliable Transport
 
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?



I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were
not.


Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on the
back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a wheel.

Simon Jester December 28th 17 06:26 PM

Reliable Transport
 
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 5:46:25 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?



I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were
not.


Just for once you thought correctly.


Har! Har! Har! and indeed Har!


Mr Pounder Esquire December 28th 17 06:56 PM

Reliable Transport
 
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?



I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were
not.


Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on the
back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a wheel.


I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members breaking the
law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a ginnel
where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on the footpath
was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his reply. I
don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to be a stupid
****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ bigger than
my shoe size.



Simon Jester December 28th 17 07:43 PM

Reliable Transport
 
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 6:56:56 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were
not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on the
back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a wheel.


I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members breaking the
law.




I assume you have never driven even 0.001 mph above the speed limit.


Mr Pounder Esquire December 28th 17 08:34 PM

Reliable Transport
 
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 6:56:56 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles
were not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on the
back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a wheel.


I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.




I assume you have never driven even 0.001 mph above the speed limit.


Silly cyclist.

Cheap snip, but you are a silly cyclist.

Here you are, I'll put my post back:
I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members breaking the
law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a ginnel
where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on the footpath
was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his reply. I
don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to be a stupid
****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ bigger than
my shoe size.

I have never used a road vehicle on the footpath or down a ginnel.
A bicycle is classed as a road vehicle. I bet that you did not know that.






Simon Jester December 28th 17 09:24 PM

Reliable Transport
 
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 8:35:00 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 6:56:56 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles
were not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on the
back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a wheel.

I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.




I assume you have never driven even 0.001 mph above the speed limit.


Silly cyclist.

Cheap snip, but you are a silly cyclist.

Here you are, I'll put my post back:
I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members breaking the
law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a ginnel
where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on the footpath
was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his reply. I
don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to be a stupid
****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ bigger than
my shoe size.

I have never used a road vehicle on the footpath or down a ginnel.
A bicycle is classed as a road vehicle. I bet that you did not know that.


Just answer the question.
Have you ever broken the speed limit?


Mr Pounder Esquire December 28th 17 09:48 PM

Reliable Transport
 
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 8:35:00 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 6:56:56 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over
the Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles
were not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on
the back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a
wheel.

I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.



I assume you have never driven even 0.001 mph above the speed limit.


Silly cyclist.

Cheap snip, but you are a silly cyclist.

Here you are, I'll put my post back:
I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a
ginnel where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on
the footpath was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his
reply. I don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to
be a stupid ****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ
bigger than my shoe size.

I have never used a road vehicle on the footpath or down a ginnel.
A bicycle is classed as a road vehicle. I bet that you did not know
that.


Just answer the question.
Have you ever broken the speed limit?


I will answer your question if you answer the question I have several times
asked you.
Are you gay?
No disrespects if you are.
Your call.



Simon Jester December 28th 17 10:29 PM

Reliable Transport
 
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 9:48:30 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 8:35:00 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 6:56:56 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over
the Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles
were not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on
the back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a
wheel.

I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.



I assume you have never driven even 0.001 mph above the speed limit.

Silly cyclist.

Cheap snip, but you are a silly cyclist.

Here you are, I'll put my post back:
I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a
ginnel where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on
the footpath was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his
reply. I don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to
be a stupid ****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ
bigger than my shoe size.

I have never used a road vehicle on the footpath or down a ginnel.
A bicycle is classed as a road vehicle. I bet that you did not know
that.


Just answer the question.
Have you ever broken the speed limit?


I will answer your question if you answer the question I have several times
asked you.
Are you gay?
No disrespects if you are.
Your call.


No, I am not gay.

jnugent December 29th 17 12:51 AM

Reliable Transport
 
On 28/12/2017 03:48, Simon Jester wrote:

I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles.
Why is that?
I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were not.


Assuming you know (admittedly perhaps not the safest of assumptions),
what on earth are you talking about?

jnugent December 29th 17 12:53 AM

Reliable Transport
 
On 28/12/2017 21:24, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 8:35:00 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 6:56:56 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles
were not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on the
back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a wheel.

I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.



I assume you have never driven even 0.001 mph above the speed limit.


Silly cyclist.

Cheap snip, but you are a silly cyclist.

Here you are, I'll put my post back:
I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members breaking the
law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a ginnel
where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on the footpath
was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his reply. I
don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to be a stupid
****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ bigger than
my shoe size.

I have never used a road vehicle on the footpath or down a ginnel.
A bicycle is classed as a road vehicle. I bet that you did not know that.


Just answer the question.
Have you ever broken the speed limit?


If he had (just supposing), would it justify law-breaking by turd cyclists?



Peter Keller[_3_] December 29th 17 09:02 AM

Reliable Transport
 
On 28.12.2017 18:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?



I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were
not.


Just for once you thought correctly.


My bike is a very reliable delightful convenient economical viable form
of transport.
A bicycle is a machine. Like any machine, it needs to be looked after
and maintained in good repair. This goes also for those NOx spewing
monstrosities which you and your ilk belch forth every day.

Peter Keller[_3_] December 29th 17 09:04 AM

Reliable Transport
 
On 28.12.2017 19:56, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were
not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on the
back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a wheel.


I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members breaking the
law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a ginnel
where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on the footpath
was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his reply. I
don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to be a stupid
****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ bigger than
my shoe size.


I take that as a real great compliment coming from YOU. Especially from YOU.
I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Peter Keller[_3_] December 29th 17 09:05 AM

Reliable Transport
 
On 28.12.2017 21:34, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Silly cyclist.


Thanks greatly for the compliment.
Now please call me a vulgar little maggot.

Peter Keller[_3_] December 29th 17 09:06 AM

Reliable Transport
 
On 28.12.2017 22:48, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 8:35:00 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 6:56:56 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over
the Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles
were not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on
the back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a
wheel.

I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.



I assume you have never driven even 0.001 mph above the speed limit.

Silly cyclist.

Cheap snip, but you are a silly cyclist.

Here you are, I'll put my post back:
I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a
ginnel where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on
the footpath was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his
reply. I don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to
be a stupid ****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ
bigger than my shoe size.

I have never used a road vehicle on the footpath or down a ginnel.
A bicycle is classed as a road vehicle. I bet that you did not know
that.


Just answer the question.
Have you ever broken the speed limit?


I will answer your question if you answer the question I have several times
asked you.
Are you gay?
No disrespects if you are.
Your call.


I am very gay and happy, thank you. Life is good.
Oh let us have much more gaiety in our lives.

Simon Jester December 29th 17 09:38 PM

Reliable Transport
 
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 9:48:30 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 8:35:00 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 6:56:56 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 28/12/2017 17:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over
the Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles. Why is that?


I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles
were not.

Just for once you thought correctly.



I see quite a few bicycles that must be broken down, they are on
the back or the roof of cars, some of them seem to be missing a
wheel.

I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.



I assume you have never driven even 0.001 mph above the speed limit.

Silly cyclist.

Cheap snip, but you are a silly cyclist.

Here you are, I'll put my post back:
I made a complaint to the local cycling club about the members
breaking the law.
The leader of the cycling club said that illegally cycling down a
ginnel where cycling was clearly prohibited and illegally cycling on
the footpath was safer than cycling on what is a quiet road.
I very politely question his judgment and am still waiting for his
reply. I don't really expect a reply as I have politely shown him to
be a stupid ****.
Unfortunately I know a few cyclists. Not one of them has an IQ
bigger than my shoe size.

I have never used a road vehicle on the footpath or down a ginnel.
A bicycle is classed as a road vehicle. I bet that you did not know
that.


Just answer the question.
Have you ever broken the speed limit?


I will answer your question if you answer the question I have several times
asked you.
Are you gay?
No disrespects if you are.
Your call.


I have answered your question, now answer mine.


Kerr-Mudd,John[_2_] January 5th 18 08:11 PM

Reliable Transport
 
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 21:38:27 GMT, Simon Jester
wrote:

On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 9:48:30 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 8:35:00 PM UTC, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:

[]
Just answer the question.
Have you ever broken the speed limit?


I will answer your question if you answer the question I have several
times asked you.
Are you gay?
No disrespects if you are.
Your call.


I have answered your question, now answer mine.


He's a woose.

--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.

jnugent January 6th 18 05:26 PM

Reliable Transport
 
On 06/01/2018 14:26, Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote:
On 12/27/2017 7:48 PM, Simon Jester wrote:

I saw plenty of cars broken down by the side of the road over the
Violence Promoting Holiday, but no bicycles.
Why is that?
I thought cars were a viable form of transport and pedal cycles were not.


A limey trying to think...... Ah, there's the rub!
LOL


Not only that, but he claims the power to tell whether a car is broken
down or merely parked.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM.
Home - Home - Home - Home - Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com