"women's" mtbs
What is the deal with those bikes you see -- mostly MTBs -- that have a
top rail that's neither parallel to the ground (thus, strong) nor low enough to actually step through? The only explanation I can think of is that non-bike people have some Victorian-era cultural baggage that tells them the top rail must drop down a bit if they're a woman Just Because. |
"women's" mtbs
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:55:14 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
What is the deal with those bikes you see -- mostly MTBs -- that have a top rail that's neither parallel to the ground (thus, strong) nor low enough to actually step through? A) Because they are supposedly ridden/stunted over rough ground, it provides an extra gap for dismounting or lowering you seat. B) In this day an age of patent trolling, it allowed them to avoid a patent troll? C) As suggested, unisex? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com