If Canada can do it
 

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.
Acquisitive crime drops to near zero.
MP's opposed to legal weed all use weed.
One law for them.

If Canada can do it
 

On 22/10/2018 21:34, Simon Jester wrote:

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky and
both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in Canada).

Acquisitive crime drops to near zero.

That's OK as far as it goes. But many would argue that drugged-driving
is worse than theft.

MP's opposed to legal weed all use weed.

Do they?

What, all of them? How would you know that?

One law for them.

And the same law for everyone else, including - and obviously much to
your chagrin - you.

If Canada can do it
 

On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 11:27:59 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/10/2018 21:34, Simon Jester wrote:

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky and
both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in Canada).


And your point?

Acquisitive crime drops to near zero.

That's OK as far as it goes. But many would argue that drugged-driving
is worse than theft.

And your point?


MP's opposed to legal weed all use weed.

Do they?

What, all of them? How would you know that?

Not all of them but certainly some have admitted to it. TB for one.


One law for them.

And the same law for everyone else, including - and obviously much to
your chagrin - you.

Quite right. Why should I not be allowed to use weed in my own home?

If Canada can do it
 

On 23/10/2018 17:24, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 11:27:59 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/10/2018 21:34, Simon Jester wrote:

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky and
both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in Canada).


And your point?

It's obviously too complicated for you, but for a normal person ought to
be more obvious: there is no gain in swapping drunk drivers for drugged
drivers.

Even you ought to be able to work out why.

Acquisitive crime drops to near zero.

That's OK as far as it goes. But many would argue that drugged-driving
is worse than theft.

And your point?

It's obviously too complicated for you, but for a normal person ought to
be more obvious: many would argue that drugged-driving is worse than theft.

Even you ought to be able to work out why.

MP's opposed to legal weed all use weed.

Do they?
What, all of them? How would you know that?

Not all of them but certainly some have admitted to it. TB for one.

So it's all of them and not all of them.

I see.

One law for them.

And the same law for everyone else, including - and obviously much to
your chagrin - you.

Quite right. Why should I not be allowed to use weed in my own home?

Assuming you mean an illegally-cultivated drug whose possession is a
crime, the question contains its own answer.

And it would be surely a tragedy if you rode your bike whilst still
drugged up and were squashed by a juggernaut.

If Canada can do it
 

JNugent wrote:
On 23/10/2018 17:24, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 11:27:59 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/10/2018 21:34, Simon Jester wrote:

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug
driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky
and both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in
Canada).

And your point?

It's obviously too complicated for you, but for a normal person ought
to be more obvious: there is no gain in swapping drunk drivers for
drugged drivers.

Even you ought to be able to work out why.

Acquisitive crime drops to near zero.

That's OK as far as it goes. But many would argue that
drugged-driving is worse than theft.

And your point?

It's obviously too complicated for you, but for a normal person ought
to be more obvious: many would argue that drugged-driving is worse
than theft.
Even you ought to be able to work out why.

MP's opposed to legal weed all use weed.

Do they?
What, all of them? How would you know that?

Not all of them but certainly some have admitted to it. TB for one.

So it's all of them and not all of them.

I see.

One law for them.

And the same law for everyone else, including - and obviously much
to your chagrin - you.

Quite right. Why should I not be allowed to use weed in my own home?

Assuming you mean an illegally-cultivated drug whose possession is a
crime, the question contains its own answer.

And it would be surely a tragedy if you rode your bike whilst still
drugged up and were squashed by a juggernaut.

It would be one less cyclist, no tragedy.

If Canada can do it
 

On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 6:27:17 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/10/2018 17:24, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 11:27:59 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/10/2018 21:34, Simon Jester wrote:

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky and
both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in Canada).


And your point?

It's obviously too complicated for you,

And immediately lost the argument.
Let me know when you are prepared to have an ADULT discussion.

If Canada can do it
 

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky and
both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in Canada).

Probably not the drug of choice in the Tour de France.

In fact they probably don't even check for it.

If Canada can do it
 

On 10/24/18 4:22 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky and
both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in Canada).

Probably not the drug of choice in the Tour de France.

In fact they probably don't even check for it.


No check necessary.
It would become obvious during the race.

If Canada can do it
 

On 23/10/2018 20:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 6:27:17 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/10/2018 17:24, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 11:27:59 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/10/2018 21:34, Simon Jester wrote:

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky and
both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in Canada).


And your point?

It's obviously too complicated for you,

And immediately lost the argument.

Really? You either didn't understand the point when it was made, or lied
and claimed that you didn't.

Which was it?

Let me know when you are prepared to have an ADULT discussion.

Let the world know when you are going to stop asking for "the point"
after it has been explained to you.

If Canada can do it
 

On Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 11:24:55 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/10/2018 20:16, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 6:27:17 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/10/2018 17:24, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 11:27:59 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 22/10/2018 21:34, Simon Jester wrote:

Why not UK

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45806255

Legal weed in Leftpondia has been proven to reduce drink and drug driving.

Is stoned driving better than drink-driving? They're equally risky and
both illegal (in the UK and USA, and almost certainly also in Canada).


And your point?

It's obviously too complicated for you,

And immediately lost the argument.

Really? You either didn't understand the point when it was made, or lied
and claimed that you didn't.

Which was it?

Neither, you didn't make a point.
Obviously drug driving is no better than drink driving.
Both are illegal in all civilised countries plus the USA.
Just because I am in favour of legal weed does not mean I condone drug driving.


Let me know when you are prepared to have an ADULT discussion.

Let the world know when you are going to stop asking for "the point"
after it has been explained to you.

Legal weed in the US has led to a reduction in both drink and drug driving. So, once again, what was your point?