|
aramid fiber
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 01:16:54 +0100, Emanuel Berg
wrote: Maxxis Detonator 23x622 clinchers have Kevlar wire. Making the tire more straight/strong and/or lighter while making the bike more expensive? Well, replacing some plain old steel wire with an exotic synthetic material is very likely to increase prices :-) On the other hand the synthetic's are about ten gm lighter, if that is important. -- Cheers, John B. |
aramid fiber
I have now played a couple of games with the
"composite" stick (CFRP + Kevlar/aramid). The weight, including tape, stopped at 490g compared to my old wood/glass fiber which was 809g. This was certainly noticable in many positive ways. But in one way, the old wood stick was better and that was its comfort! With this, new one, it felt like every blow to it went straight thru and into my hands and forearms - really painful! I suppose the fibers of wood are less straight, or more circular (?), or something that makes them not carry thru vibrations the same way? Is this something one would notice with carbon bikes as well, compared to steel frames/forks, or do the wheels absorb most of it before it finds its way all the way into the body? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
aramid fiber
On 2/27/2018 5:14 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
I have now played a couple of games with the "composite" stick (CFRP + Kevlar/aramid). The weight, including tape, stopped at 490g compared to my old wood/glass fiber which was 809g. This was certainly noticable in many positive ways. But in one way, the old wood stick was better and that was its comfort! With this, new one, it felt like every blow to it went straight thru and into my hands and forearms - really painful! I suppose the fibers of wood are less straight, or more circular (?), or something that makes them not carry thru vibrations the same way? Is this something one would notice with carbon bikes as well, compared to steel frames/forks, or do the wheels absorb most of it before it finds its way all the way into the body? What sort of stick? Like a police baton? Wood works pretty well to ensure the message is received(personal experience). -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
aramid fiber
AMuzi wrote:
What sort of stick? Like a police baton? Wood works pretty well to ensure the message is received(personal experience). Ha ha, what did you do? Student street rally? Stick = ice hockey stick. The composite stick material is what has elevated the game to a whole new skill level. That, and new methods with training but yes, to a large extent the new stick material. To me, it doesn't really elevate anything, it is just a nice toy, but the kids make the most of it for sure... -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
aramid fiber
On 27/02/2018 6:14 PM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
I have now played a couple of games with the "composite" stick (CFRP + Kevlar/aramid). The weight, including tape, stopped at 490g compared to my old wood/glass fiber which was 809g. This was certainly noticable in many positive ways. But in one way, the old wood stick was better and that was its comfort! With this, new one, it felt like every blow to it went straight thru and into my hands and forearms - really painful! I suppose the fibers of wood are less straight, or more circular (?), or something that makes them not carry thru vibrations the same way? Is this something one would notice with carbon bikes as well, compared to steel frames/forks, or do the wheels absorb most of it before it finds its way all the way into the body? Is there any particular reason that you think the parameters for a hockey stick would be similar to a bike? One thing noticeable about composite hockey sticks is that they break a lot more than wooden ones. |
aramid fiber
Duane wrote:
Is there any particular reason that you think the parameters for a hockey stick would be similar to a bike? Yes, the material. -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 |
aramid fiber
On 28/02/2018 11:51 AM, Emanuel Berg wrote:
Duane wrote: Is there any particular reason that you think the parameters for a hockey stick would be similar to a bike? Yes, the material. Material is not a parameter. A parameter is an operating consideration. I seldom try to apply 100 lb stress for a slap shot with my bike. At least not intentionally. But the hockey stick is intended to do this when loading the stick. I expect when my bike was designed the stress parameters were different. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com