CycleBanter.com

CycleBanter.com (http://www.cyclebanter.com/index.php)
-   UK (http://www.cyclebanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Pavement cyclist in court for assault . You would have a job to thinkof this mitigation. (http://www.cyclebanter.com/showthread.php?t=255467)

Mr Pounder Esquire February 9th 18 08:28 PM

Pavement cyclist in court for assault . You would have a job to think of this mitigation.
 
Peter Parry wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 04:55:15 -0800 (PST), Simon Jester
wrote:


An arrestable offence is one with a maximum sentence of 5 or more
years in prison with the exception of drunk driving and twoc.
Luckily for motorists common assault does not fall under that
category.



"Arrestable offence" ceased to exist on 1 January 2006 when the
Serious Organised Crime and Police Act came into force.


Now you have really upset the little snowflake on his little bicycle.
Never mind, he is not very bright.



Simon Jester February 9th 18 08:59 PM

Pavement cyclist in court for assault . You would have a job tothink of this mitigation.
 
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 5:06:38 PM UTC, Peter Parry wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 04:55:15 -0800 (PST), Simon Jester
wrote:


An arrestable offence is one with a maximum sentence of 5 or more years in prison with the exception of drunk driving and twoc.
Luckily for motorists common assault does not fall under that category.



"Arrestable offence" ceased to exist on 1 January 2006 when the
Serious Organised Crime and Police Act came into force.


Precisely my point, we live in a Police State.
We do not need to carry ID or show ID to the Police, but failure to do so means you must be hiding something so the Police can demand ID under threat of Lethal Force.




MrCheerful February 9th 18 09:17 PM

Pavement cyclist in court for assault . You would have a job tothink of this mitigation.
 
On 09/02/2018 20:28, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Peter Parry wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 04:55:15 -0800 (PST), Simon Jester
wrote:


An arrestable offence is one with a maximum sentence of 5 or more
years in prison with the exception of drunk driving and twoc.
Luckily for motorists common assault does not fall under that
category.



"Arrestable offence" ceased to exist on 1 January 2006 when the
Serious Organised Crime and Police Act came into force.


Now you have really upset the little snowflake on his little bicycle.
Never mind, he is not very bright.


Was he a Judge Lee trainee?

Mr Pounder Esquire February 9th 18 11:15 PM

Pavement cyclist in court for assault . You would have a job to think of this mitigation.
 
MrCheerful wrote:
On 09/02/2018 20:28, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Peter Parry wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 04:55:15 -0800 (PST), Simon Jester
wrote:


An arrestable offence is one with a maximum sentence of 5 or more
years in prison with the exception of drunk driving and twoc.
Luckily for motorists common assault does not fall under that
category.


"Arrestable offence" ceased to exist on 1 January 2006 when the
Serious Organised Crime and Police Act came into force.


Now you have really upset the little snowflake on his little bicycle.
Never mind, he is not very bright.


Was he a Judge Lee trainee?


I don't think so. Judge Lee did sometimes make some sort of sense. This guy
has never raised a valid point. He is not very bright.




Simon Jester February 10th 18 12:09 PM

Pavement cyclist in court for assault . You would have a job tothink of this mitigation.
 
On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 11:16:21 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
On 09/02/2018 20:28, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Peter Parry wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 04:55:15 -0800 (PST), Simon Jester
wrote:


An arrestable offence is one with a maximum sentence of 5 or more
years in prison with the exception of drunk driving and twoc.
Luckily for motorists common assault does not fall under that
category.


"Arrestable offence" ceased to exist on 1 January 2006 when the
Serious Organised Crime and Police Act came into force.

Now you have really upset the little snowflake on his little bicycle.
Never mind, he is not very bright.


Was he a Judge Lee trainee?


I don't think so. Judge Lee did sometimes make some sort of sense. This guy
has never raised a valid point. He is not very bright.


This from the 'guy' who spends all day, every day in his council bedsit searching for articles about misbehaving cyclists.
Have you ever raised a valid point? (Childish name calling does not count)



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM.
Home - Home - Home - Home - Home

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com