Kill-filing
On 12/7/2010 8:16 AM, Tºm Shermªn™ °_° wrote:
On 12/6/2010 10:26 PM, Edward Dolan wrote: "T�m Sherm�nT " wrote in message ... On 12/6/2010 10:08 AM, Duane H�bert wrote: At home I use Outlook Express for a news reader.[...] Bill Gates holding a gun to your head? Most of us are already paying enough for our Internet connection without the extra expense of a newsreader. I paid $0.00 for Mozilla Thunderbird. http://www.mozilla.org/ I didn't pay of OE. What difference does it make anyway? The point was that you are preventing people from replying to you with the same method that you're trying to prevent them from kill filing you. Just saying. |
Kill-filing
On Tuesday, December 7, 2010 at 6:26:40 AM UTC-8, Duane Hébert wrote:
On 12/7/2010 8:16 AM, Tºm Shermªn™ °_° wrote: On 12/6/2010 10:26 PM, Edward Dolan wrote: "T�m Sherm�nT " wrote in message ... On 12/6/2010 10:08 AM, Duane H�bert wrote: At home I use Outlook Express for a news reader.[...] Bill Gates holding a gun to your head? Most of us are already paying enough for our Internet connection without the extra expense of a newsreader. I paid $0.00 for Mozilla Thunderbird. http://www.mozilla.org/ I didn't pay of OE. What difference does it make anyway? The point was that you are preventing people from replying to you with the same method that you're trying to prevent them from kill filing you. Just saying. Kill filing is hardly effective when everyone else is quoting you in their posts. |
Kill-filing
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:45:40 -0700, sltom992 wrote:
Kill filing is hardly effective when everyone else is quoting you in their posts. At that stage you just killfile the morons that quote morons. Improves the signal to noise ratio. |
Kill-filing
wrote in message
... [...] I didn't pay of OE. What difference does it make anyway? The point was that you are preventing people from replying to you with the same method that you're trying to prevent them from kill filing you. Just saying. Kill filing is hardly effective when everyone else is quoting you in their posts. I think kill filing is more effective these days. There seems to be several methods of doing it now on YouTube I notice. I am against kill filing anyone for any reasons whosoever, except in cases of criminal harassment. It is terrific fun to read what morons and idiots think of me and my opinions. Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
Kill-filing
"news18" wrote in message ...
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:45:40 -0700, sltom992 wrote: Kill filing is hardly effective when everyone else is quoting you in their posts. At that stage you just killfile the morons that quote morons. Improves the signal to noise ratio. Who cares about the signal to noise ratio. Kill filing always arises out of being disagreed with and is usually followed by a few harsh words, as if words can hurt us. Morons have a right to their thoughts also. The real problem is that kill filers take communication among anonymous posters on social media way too serious. Think of it as fun and games and you will never go wrong - and you will never kill file anyone. The only exceptions I can think of is if you are getting threats of physical violence. Then it is time to kill file the dumb *******! I think I have been blocked (banned) from at least a dozen arts channels on YouTube from making comments. Why? Because I disagreed with some sissified jerk who thinks his opinions are sacred. Mostly such types just want their asses kissed and to be told how wonderful they are. They are not up for an argument. Such types should not make their channels available for comments to begin with. In any event, whenever I am blocked, I consider it a victory. I not only got the last word, but the best word. But screw all these sensitive sissified cowardly blockers all the way to Hell and back! The should stay off of social media. Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com