Drunk driver wriggles free of ban
 

"Neijus Gaska, 35, of Wingfield Road, east Hull, was fined £200 but avoided a driving ban for drink-driving and breaching a suspended sentence. He had ten points put on his licence and must pay £85 costs and a £30 surcharge. There was no totting disqualification and "exceptional hardship" was found, that he would lose his livelihood as a takeaway driver."

Read more at http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/drink...YzLTlrT6faD.99

Drunk driver wriggles free of ban
 

On 13/12/2016 09:44, Simon Mason wrote:
"Neijus Gaska, 35, of Wingfield Road, east Hull, was fined £200 but avoided a driving ban for drink-driving and breaching a suspended sentence. He had ten points put on his licence and must pay £85 costs and a £30 surcharge. There was no totting disqualification and "exceptional hardship" was found, that he would lose his livelihood as a takeaway driver."

Read more at http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/drink...YzLTlrT6faD.99

That's ridiculous that he didn't get the mandatory 1 year ban. Most
convicted drink drivers get a years ban and most of those too will
either lose their livelyhoods/businesses and suffer extreme hardship as
well.
Why is he so special !?

Drunk driver wriggles free of ban
 

On 13/12/2016 10:34, Bod wrote:

On 13/12/2016 09:44, Simon Mason wrote:

"Neijus Gaska, 35, of Wingfield Road, east Hull, was fined £200 but
avoided a driving ban for drink-driving and breaching a suspended
sentence. He had ten points put on his licence and must pay £85 costs
and a £30 surcharge. There was no totting disqualification and
"exceptional hardship" was found, that he would lose his livelihood as
a takeaway driver."

Read more at
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/drink...YzLTlrT6faD.99

That's ridiculous that he didn't get the mandatory 1 year ban. Most
convicted drink drivers get a years ban and most of those too will
either lose their livelyhoods/businesses and suffer extreme hardship as
well.
Why is he so special !?

You took the question right out of my mouth.

Drunk driver wriggles free of ban
 

On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 10:34:57 UTC, Bod wrote:
On 13/12/2016 09:44, Simon Mason wrote:
"Neijus Gaska, 35, of Wingfield Road, east Hull, was fined £200 but avoided a driving ban for drink-driving and breaching a suspended sentence. He had ten points put on his licence and must pay £85 costs and a £30 surcharge. There was no totting disqualification and "exceptional hardship" was found, that he would lose his livelihood as a takeaway driver.."

Read more at http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/drink...YzLTlrT6faD.99

That's ridiculous that he didn't get the mandatory 1 year ban. Most
convicted drink drivers get a years ban and most of those too will
either lose their livelyhoods/businesses and suffer extreme hardship as
well.
Why is he so special !?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...fer-fears.html

Drunk driver wriggles free of ban
 

On 13/12/2016 12:55, Simon Mason wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 10:34:57 UTC, Bod wrote:
On 13/12/2016 09:44, Simon Mason wrote:
"Neijus Gaska, 35, of Wingfield Road, east Hull, was fined £200 but avoided a driving ban for drink-driving and breaching a suspended sentence. He had ten points put on his licence and must pay £85 costs and a £30 surcharge. There was no totting disqualification and "exceptional hardship" was found, that he would lose his livelihood as a takeaway driver."

Read more at http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/drink...YzLTlrT6faD.99

That's ridiculous that he didn't get the mandatory 1 year ban. Most
convicted drink drivers get a years ban and most of those too will
either lose their livelyhoods/businesses and suffer extreme hardship as
well.
Why is he so special !?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...fer-fears.html

Do Hull judges have separate laws or something?

Drunk driver wriggles free of ban
 

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:34:57 -0000, Bod wrote:

On 13/12/2016 09:44, Simon Mason wrote:
"Neijus Gaska, 35, of Wingfield Road, east Hull, was fined £200 but avoided a driving ban for drink-driving and breaching a suspended sentence. He had ten points put on his licence and must pay £85 costs and a £30 surcharge. There was no totting disqualification and "exceptional hardship" was found, that he would lose his livelihood as a takeaway driver."

Read more at http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/drink...YzLTlrT6faD.99

That's ridiculous that he didn't get the mandatory 1 year ban. Most
convicted drink drivers get a years ban and most of those too will
either lose their livelyhoods/businesses and suffer extreme hardship as
well.
Why is he so special !?

He did no harm.

--
If vegetarians eat vegetables, what do humanitarians eat?

Drunk driver wriggles free of ban
 

On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 18:01:18 UTC, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


Why is he so special !?

He did no harm.

Even tee-totallers get done.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/spo...s-beliefs.html