| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
|
Another one kiled by a cyclist
|
Another one kiled by a cyclist
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 23:39:12 GMT, MrCheerful
wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...iding-crawl-ki lled-recruitment-agent.html https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...nt_data/file/6 81593/quarterly-estimates-july-to-september-2017.pdf KSI up = more careless drivers. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
Another one kiled by a cyclist
On 11/04/2018 10:31, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 23:39:12 GMT, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...iding-crawl-ki lled-recruitment-agent.html https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...nt_data/file/6 81593/quarterly-estimates-july-to-september-2017.pdf KSI up = more careless drivers. Did you read that before writing your comment? ksi reporting methods regarding severity have changed, so comparison with previous years figures is impossible. Killed is down 4 percent 5 deaths per billion miles travelled by motor traffic total casualties are down 5 per cent. motor traffic is up one percent. |
Another one kiled by a cyclist
On 11/04/18 10:54, MrCheerful wrote:
On 11/04/2018 10:31, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 23:39:12 GMT, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...iding-crawl-ki lled-recruitment-agent.html How many "another ones" have been killed by drivers in the months since the last one? It must be very disappointing for you when there is no suggestion of law breaking or lack of care. https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...nt_data/file/6 81593/quarterly-estimates-july-to-september-2017.pdf KSI up = more careless drivers. Did you read that before writing your comment? ksi reporting methods regarding severity have changed, so comparison with previous years figures is impossible. Killed is down 4 percent 5 deaths per billion miles travelled by motor traffic Completely irrelevant to pedestrians. total casualties are down 5 per cent. motor traffic is up one percent. Increased traffic and reduced casualties have gone together for nearly 50 years. |
Another one kiled by a cyclist
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:42:23 GMT, TMS320 wrote:
On 11/04/18 10:54, MrCheerful wrote: On 11/04/2018 10:31, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 23:39:12 GMT, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...t-riding-crawl -ki lled-recruitment-agent.html How many "another ones" have been killed by drivers in the months since the last one? It must be very disappointing for you when there is no suggestion of law breaking or lack of care. https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...tachment_data/ file/6 81593/quarterly-estimates-july-to-september-2017.pdf KSI up = more careless drivers. Did you read that before writing your comment? Did you read the actual death figures; how many of them did you post a report on to the motoring NG? ksi reporting methods regarding severity have changed, so comparison with previous years figures is impossible. Killed is down 4 percent 5 deaths per billion miles travelled by motor traffic distance travelled is not a releavant measure. Completely irrelevant to pedestrians. total casualties are down 5 per cent. deaths. Not "accidents" Primarily due to better paramedic care. motor traffic is up one percent. Increased traffic and reduced casualties have gone together for nearly 50 years. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
Another one kiled by a cyclist
On 11/04/2018 15:25, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:42:23 GMT, TMS320 wrote: On 11/04/18 10:54, MrCheerful wrote: On 11/04/2018 10:31, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 23:39:12 GMT, MrCheerful wrote: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...t-riding-crawl -ki lled-recruitment-agent.html How many "another ones" have been killed by drivers in the months since the last one? It must be very disappointing for you when there is no suggestion of law breaking or lack of care. https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...tachment_data/ file/6 81593/quarterly-estimates-july-to-september-2017.pdf KSI up = more careless drivers. Did you read that before writing your comment? Did you read the actual death figures; how many of them did you post a report on to the motoring NG? ksi reporting methods regarding severity have changed, so comparison with previous years figures is impossible. Killed is down 4 percent 5 deaths per billion miles travelled by motor traffic distance travelled is not a releavant measure. Completely irrelevant to pedestrians. total casualties are down 5 per cent. deaths. Not "accidents" Primarily due to better paramedic care. motor traffic is up one percent. Increased traffic and reduced casualties have gone together for nearly 50 years. I do not post anything to motoring groups. This is actually a cycling group. I see that per billion miles travelled cyclists kill 5 times as many pedestrians as motor traffic does. Statistics tell a lot of things. |
Another one kiled by a cyclist
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:25:12 PM UTC+1, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
Did you read the actual death figures; how many of them did you post a report on to the motoring NG? https://groups.google.com/d/msg/uk.r...I/xSxA7vEhNTQJ |
Another one kiled by a cyclist
On 11/04/18 20:44, MrCheerful wrote:
I do not post anything to motoring groups. Why do you not link all these press reports on motoring groups? This is actually a cycling group. It used to be. Go away. I see that per billion miles travelled cyclists kill 5 times as many pedestrians as motor traffic does. Statistics tell a lot of things. No, it merely tells us that you can do long division on a calculator. Have you ever heard of the expression GIGO? |
Another one kiled by a cyclist
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:44:57 GMT, MrCheerful
I do not post anything to motoring groups. I see, so you're a hypocrit. I don't beleive you've ever once posted anything nice about cycling or cyclists. "Mr Cheerful". -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
Another one kiled by a cyclist
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com