Advice for first bike: new or used (specialized allez elite vs cannondale r2000)
Hi...
This will be my first real road bike purchase so, apologies if this sounds a bit silly. I'm looking to buy my first real road bike in 15 years (Im 31). I will be using it for a triathlon here in California in Sept. Afterwards I hope to integrate some touring(w/camping), but Ill never do any racing. My budget is $850 for bike + $150 for everything else. I'm looking at two bikes: 1) New Specialized allez elite 2004 triple. Can get it at my LBS for $850+tax which seems like a good price. (is there a way to stop the clicking of the derailer?) 2) A good condition used 1999 Cannondale R2000 with Ultegra, Cane Creek Crono Wheels, Reynolds Carbon Fiber Fork, 3T Prima 199 Handlebar, CP Pave ergometric seat. Asking is $800. Its from a guy at work and the bike has been taken care of, and the size is right. Here's a pictu http://us.f2.yahoofs.com/bc/409afe82...ZPOvABkWXm2Vy8 I ruled out the Giant OCR1 since it didnt seem to fit as well. Assuming both bikes fit me well, which would you go for? I think most would say go for the new bike, but I think the cannondale might be a better deal. I still have my '94 cannon MTB and I think they make good stuff; brother swears by specialized. Either way, Im going to be happy. :) Thanks in advance, matt |
Advice for first bike: new or used (specialized allez elite vs cannondale r2000)
"Matt Bouchard" wrote in message
om... | Hi... | | This will be my first real road bike purchase so, apologies if this | sounds a bit silly. I'm looking to buy my first real road bike in 15 | years (Im 31). I will be using it for a triathlon here in California | in Sept. Afterwards I hope to integrate some touring(w/camping), but | Ill never do any racing. My budget is $850 for bike + $150 for | everything else. | | I'm looking at two bikes: | | 1) New Specialized allez elite 2004 triple. Can get it at my LBS for | $850+tax which seems like a good price. (is there a way to stop the | clicking of the derailer?) | | 2) A good condition used 1999 Cannondale R2000 with Ultegra, Cane | Creek Crono Wheels, Reynolds Carbon Fiber Fork, 3T Prima 199 | Handlebar, CP Pave ergometric seat. Asking is $800. Its from a guy at | work and the bike has been taken care of, and the size is right. | Here's a pictu http://us.f2.yahoofs.com/bc/409afe82...ZPOvABkWXm2Vy8 | | I ruled out the Giant OCR1 since it didnt seem to fit as well. | | Assuming both bikes fit me well, which would you go for? I think most | would say go for the new bike, but I think the cannondale might be a | better deal. I still have my '94 cannon MTB and I think they make good | stuff; brother swears by specialized. Either way, Im going to be | happy. :) My opinion is the Cannondale is the better bike for road riding and the Tri you want it for. But not well suited for loaded touring. Take a look at these (or any bike) and ask yourself how you are going to put a rack and panniers on the bike. The Cannondale is a CAAD4 frame, and although there appear to be small holes on the rear dropouts for mounting a rack, the length of the chanistays make a rack and bags uncomfortable. They are too short and you will be kicking the panniers with your heels all the time. Touring bikes tend to have a longer wheelbase, and a lot of that is in the distance between the seat tube and the rear hub. The Specialized has front and rear rack mounts.But, it's hard to imagine putting much on either end. It has a compact frame and short chainstays as well. Racing bikes make uncomfortable tourers. Not only will you be having troubles with the bags, but it will be pretty twitchy with all that weight on it. Since you appear to be just a recreational or entry level triathlete, I recommend getting a bike that is more suited for touring and simply pull off all the unnecessary bits for the Tri to save weight. If you can only get one bike, that is the better direction to head. On the other had, if the touring thing is still just in the 'thinking about it' stage, ask yourself if you're really going to tour and camp with a bike. If you really aren't, back to the Cannondale. Nice bike, and maybe you can talk the price down a smidgeon. |
Advice for first bike: new or used (specialized allez elite vscannondale r2000)
John Rees wrote:
My opinion is the Cannondale is the better bike for road riding and the Tri you want it for. But not well suited for loaded touring. Take a look at these (or any bike) and ask yourself how you are going to put a rack and panniers on the bike. The Cannondale is a CAAD4 frame, and although there appear to be small holes on the rear dropouts for mounting a rack, the length of the chanistays make a rack and bags uncomfortable. They are too short and you will be kicking the panniers with your heels all the time. I just got back from my latest bicycle camping tour with my Cannondale R800 'criterium-style' close coupled frame. The rear rack is attached to those "small holes on the rear dropouts" and I have no problems with heel clearance on my rear panniers. Touring bikes tend to have a longer wheelbase, and a lot of that is in the distance between the seat tube and the rear hub. The Specialized has front and rear rack mounts.But, it's hard to imagine putting much on either end. It has a compact frame and short chainstays as well. Racing bikes make uncomfortable tourers. Not only will you be having troubles with the bags, but it will be pretty twitchy with all that weight on it. That hasn't been my experience with my Cannondale. I've had other bikes with a more typical touring geometry, but the short wheelbase Cannondale is the one I prefer to use for touring. It has a very solid feel with the panniers loaded for camping and I hardly notice the load except for the way it slows me down when going uphill. The only disadvantages I notice are that I'm restricted from using tires much over 25 mm wide and I can't fit full fenders (but the rear rack serves as a partial fender and I put a water deflector under the downtube to minimize spray from the front wheel). |
Advice for first bike: new or used (specialized allez elite vscannondale r2000)
May I add one small point: if you buy the Specialized new you get a
10-year warranty on the frame. Having broken my old Specialized 2000 year model frame last year I was delighted to receive a 2004 year model replacement with NO charges. Just something to consider among the other fine points made here. Gary Matt Bouchard wrote: Hi... This will be my first real road bike purchase so, apologies if this sounds a bit silly. I'm looking to buy my first real road bike in 15 years (Im 31). I will be using it for a triathlon here in California in Sept. Afterwards I hope to integrate some touring(w/camping), but Ill never do any racing. My budget is $850 for bike + $150 for everything else. I'm looking at two bikes: 1) New Specialized allez elite 2004 triple. Can get it at my LBS for $850+tax which seems like a good price. (is there a way to stop the clicking of the derailer?) 2) A good condition used 1999 Cannondale R2000 with Ultegra, Cane Creek Crono Wheels, Reynolds Carbon Fiber Fork, 3T Prima 199 Handlebar, CP Pave ergometric seat. Asking is $800. Its from a guy at work and the bike has been taken care of, and the size is right. Here's a pictu http://us.f2.yahoofs.com/bc/409afe82...ZPOvABkWXm2Vy8 I ruled out the Giant OCR1 since it didnt seem to fit as well. Assuming both bikes fit me well, which would you go for? I think most would say go for the new bike, but I think the cannondale might be a better deal. I still have my '94 cannon MTB and I think they make good stuff; brother swears by specialized. Either way, Im going to be happy. :) Thanks in advance, matt |
Advice for first bike: new or used (specialized allez elite vs cannondale r2000)
Thanks for all the feedback.
I firstly wanted to know if buying a used bike for my first, was a bad idea. Since no one mentioned that, then I think everyone agrees its ok. I didnt know how much bikes have changed over five years, but it looks like the Cannondale is still a good bike. For the touring thing: it really is a "might do it someday" thing, and based on the second reply, it looks like it can do some light touring, which is all i really need here in California - maybe a total of 7-10 pounds of gear. The one hesitation is that the Cannondale is a double and not a triple. I'll likely be moving back to San Francisco afterwards, but I know lots of people use doubles on small hills. For reply number three, I had thought Cannondale had a lifetime warranty on the frame. I totally respect Specialized and Im considering buying the cannondale and using it for a year then getting a nice specialized if I stick with cycling. matt Gary wrote in message ... May I add one small point: if you buy the Specialized new you get a 10-year warranty on the frame. Having broken my old Specialized 2000 year model frame last year I was delighted to receive a 2004 year model replacement with NO charges. Just something to consider among the other fine points made here. Gary Matt Bouchard wrote: Hi... This will be my first real road bike purchase so, apologies if this sounds a bit silly. I'm looking to buy my first real road bike in 15 years (Im 31). I will be using it for a triathlon here in California in Sept. Afterwards I hope to integrate some touring(w/camping), but Ill never do any racing. My budget is $850 for bike + $150 for everything else. I'm looking at two bikes: 1) New Specialized allez elite 2004 triple. Can get it at my LBS for $850+tax which seems like a good price. (is there a way to stop the clicking of the derailer?) 2) A good condition used 1999 Cannondale R2000 with Ultegra, Cane Creek Crono Wheels, Reynolds Carbon Fiber Fork, 3T Prima 199 Handlebar, CP Pave ergometric seat. Asking is $800. Its from a guy at work and the bike has been taken care of, and the size is right. Here's a pictu http://us.f2.yahoofs.com/bc/409afe82...ZPOvABkWXm2Vy8 I ruled out the Giant OCR1 since it didnt seem to fit as well. Assuming both bikes fit me well, which would you go for? I think most would say go for the new bike, but I think the cannondale might be a better deal. I still have my '94 cannon MTB and I think they make good stuff; brother swears by specialized. Either way, Im going to be happy. :) Thanks in advance, matt |
Advice for first bike: new or used (specialized allez elite vs cannondale r2000)
|
Advice for first bike: new or used (specialized allez elite vs cannondale r2000)
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:31:16 -0700, Matt Bouchard wrote:
I firstly wanted to know if buying a used bike for my first, was a bad idea. Since no one mentioned that, then I think everyone agrees its ok. I didnt know how much bikes have changed over five years, but it looks like the Cannondale is still a good bike. Things have changed some over 5 years, but not so much at this price level. The big thing, the only thing, to worry about is fit. With a new bike you can get the right size with a little work. They will often swap out stems in order to improve the fit, and maybe swap saddles to suit. A used bike, OTOH, doesn't allow you to change anything. If it fits _perfectly_, go for it. If not, get the new one. -- David L. Johnson __o | "Business!" cried the Ghost. "Mankind was my business. The common _`\(,_ | welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and (_)/ (_) | benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!" --Dickens, "A Christmas Carol" |
Advice for first bike: new or used (specialized allez elite vs cannondale r2000)
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CycleBanter.com