On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 23:19:36 -0500, "EdwardDolan"
wrote:

"John B." wrote in message ...

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:58:15 -0500, "EdwardDolan"
wrote:

"John B." wrote in message
. ..
[...]

As for intelligent, I suspect that few will accept your repetitive
arguments as intelligent. The "it's all mine and I don't care if the
government did build it everyone, you can't use it if I don't let
you." Over and over and over again.

Jesus Christ, you are worse than stupid. What led off this thread if not a
series of very good arguments for why wilderness and why it should be
limited to walkers.

But Dolly, when your "very good arguments" are analyzed they appear to
be, basically, "Dolan knows everything". And in some indescribable
manner, "Dolan is the appointed spokesman."

What does the above comment have to do with my arguments of trails for hikers only. There was nothing repetitive about the arguments presented in the article enclosed nor is there in my thousands of comments on this newsgroup. God Damn! Do you know anything at all about addressing an issue?

Tell us Dolly, how did you get to be the spokesman for government
owned areas of the U.S.? Was there an election? I mean, while I don't
watch Washington going on's with an eagle eye, I never saw any
announcement of your appointment.

Irrelevant!

Or you some self anointed spokesman. Elected by a majority of one, to
dictate what should and should not be done on the approximately
635,600,000 acres of Federal Property?

Irrelevant!

What is next? The bent cross arm bands and "sieg heil, sieg heil" with
the arm in the air? Do we address you as "Great Leader"? Are the
camps being built even now?

Irrelevant!

Dolan, face reality, you are mentally just a tiny, little, boy
guarding your toy box and loudly proclaiming "You can't play with my
toys!"

Irrelevant!

And to make matters even more ridiculous, they aren't your toys.

Irrelevant!

I have not so far detected any argument for why bikes should be permitted on hiking trails. Instead of going on and on with irrelevancies, try to make a case for your side. I have more than made the case for my side.

There doesn't have to be any argument for bicycles on Federal
Property, there does, however have to be an argument to ban them

To date, we seem to have Dolan, not providing an argument or any
reason except "I don't want them here", which is insufficient
justification.

So effectually, for all your ranting you have yet to provide any
concrete argument, nor any real reason except, "I don't Want them
Here!"

Which, I hate to say, is insufficient evidence.
--
cheers,

John B.