John B. (Bull****ter);news16;cyclintom
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 02:12:56 -0500, "EdwardDolan"
The above 3 juvenile pipsqueaks thought to take on one of the giants of
Usenet. But how to do that? The only way they could, by posting in concert
on the same theme – let us dispute single words!
John B. is mainly a me too-er, never having anything original to say, but
that was the case with the other 2 pipsqueaks also. All they ended up doing
was reinforcing their common idiocy. But has anyone ever heard a mountain
biker make a good defense of their sport? They can only act in concert,
being of course too dumb and cowardly ever to say anything original on their
Also, note the anonymity of such spineless jellyfish. I am out in the open
with a real name. John B. is fearful of exposing his last name and the other
2 cowards prefer gibberish to names.
Usually after about a dozen or so back and forth, you have figured out who
is who and that is the case here. To waste time on ignorant fools marks you
as a fool yourself. My Greatness forbids that, so they will henceforth be
treated with the contempt they have earned.
The ONLY way to engage someone of My Greatness is to bring up some substance
for discussion. If you do that, all will be well. If you prefer to call
names, then that is what you will get in return. And I have more stored up
bile than any of the rest of you.
Mountain bikes have wheels. Wheels are for roads.
Trails are for walking. What’s the matter? Can’t walk?
Ed Dolan the Great – Minnesota
Ohooo Doody, you lied to us.
In your previous post you stated that, "I know how to handle fools
from long experience on Usenet, the main thing being never to waste
any time on them."
And here your right back in the muck wasting your time. so apparently
in addition to being a narrow minded bigot you are also a liar.
I assume that you will be changing your signature block to read "Dolan
(I was going to say "Dolan the Liar" but "Prevaricator" is such a big
and important sounding word that I though you would prefer it)