CycleBanter.com - View Single Post

**Dave - Cyclists VOR** · December 23rd 12, 01:21 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.net.news.moderation

On 23/12/2012 13:08, wrote:
Bertie Wooster wrote:

Why should I be barred from responding to his polite and reasonable
question in the moderated group?

You aren't.

His question did not appear in the group; therefore an attempt to reply
is a nullity. This issue has been previously dealt with: a quote from a
rejected post was itself grounds for rejection, and rightfully so; and I
think you know that - otherwise you would have submitted a post with
your reply to the quote you obtained by assiduously scanning the logs
until you found something with which you could continue your
group-wrecking activities.

There you are Cwispie - slapped legs.

I think a spell in the naughty corner is called for, you little group
wrecker.

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."