The authors are part of a cabal that wish all countries to have MHL for
all cyclists. Recently they have published papers that, in their minds,
prove the MHL introduction in Australia did _not_ result in far fewer
people cycling, and then based on that work, in a follow up paper showed
that assuming the same number of people were cycling after MHLs
introduction, some calculated number of people were saved based on
fatalities before & after.
Now they wish to discredit prior works that claim regular cycling health
benefits outweigh risks. They will stop at nothing to further
marginalise healthy and benign active transport.
Meanwhile there is an org calling for pedestrians to be forced to wear
Where will it end?