Smith's hopeless floundering around a subject he has zero training in
is one thing.
Advocating the most despicable intrusion on a grieving family is quite
another, let alone Smith's blatant dishonesty and misunderstanding,
deliberate or accidental, of proper, peer-reviewed researchers' data.
A family struggle to come to terms with someone they love dying, then
Smith's speeding tickets addressed to the dead person plop through the
letterbox, and you defend this "smeggy"?
Incidentally "smeggy", are you the same "smeggy" who blames children
and parents rather than the driver when a child RTA takes place?:
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/vi...ghlight=smeggy
Everyone else's fault, isn't it "smeggy"?
If a child gets killed as you speed past the school it's the dumbass
parents' fault for being stupid, eh?
How about another "smeggers" pearl of wisdom, and this one even outdoes
proven liar and perverter of justice Paul Smith:
Crash risk is linked to speeding:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/w...ds/4944834.stm
Smeggers
Posted - 26/04/2006 : 13:33:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The biggest load of rot I have read in a long long time...
Ask i any statician and its all anbout probabilities...
The more miles you drive, the more likely you are to crash and more
likely you are to get caught by a speed camera.
Nothing whatseover to do with speed unless you're some reckless boy
racer who gets flashed and does little mileage per annum. "
That's seriously your considered opinion is it "smeggy"?
That breaking the law is inevitable when you drive?
You can't help it, is that right?
Beyond belief.
Recidivists dredge up any and every excuse for their behaviour that
they can find.
Rapists claim the woman led them on.
Paedophiles blame the child.
Smeggy and Paul Smith also blame the child, or the parents, or claim
that speeding is "inevitable", or lie about what the road rafety
research says, or issue dishonest press releases, or condone death
threats to woman.
Beneath contempt.