On 1 jun, 12:02, "Mentalguy2k8" wrote:
"Justin" wrote in message

...

On 1 jun, 10:49, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Justin wrote:
On 31 mei, 18:33, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Same old story, down a hill too fast, ploughs into another cyclist
causing serious injury and the lack of identity marks means he skips
off sharpish.
You have no information regarding the reason that he skipped off.

Perhaps he did not have fridge-freezer insurance?
You have no information regarding the reason that he skipped off. Nor
do I.

OK, so why don't you list a few reasons why he "skipped off" after causing a
serious injury to another cyclist, that a court may accept as mitigation?

Why should I? I have posted nothing about mitigation, nothing about a
court case and nothing condoning the action.
I only posted that it is not possible for a contributor to this worthy
forum to know what the reason was for this cyclist skipping off. The
fact that you are asking me what the reason could have been is proof
of that lack of knowledge.