On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 06:51:04 -0500, Tom Sherman °_°
wrote:

On 10/15/2010 4:40 AM, Harry Brogan wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 19:49:18 -0500, Tom Sherman °_°
wrote:

On 10/14/2010 7:19 PM, Harry Brogan wrote:
Well...here I am yet again hoping for some decent and exciting
conversations....Hell...maybe even a few arguments as well!!!!

Mr. Ed Dolan fails to see the value in having rear suspension on a
tadpole trike, while I believe that rear suspension offers comfort and
control benefits that outweigh the additional mass, expense and maintenance.

I may be biased since I purchased the assets of dormant manufacturer of
rear suspended tadpole trikes.


Interesting, rear suspension on a tad. Well, I have never had the
chace to take one for a ride so I could not make an informed comment.

However, I am sure that there would be certain advantages as well as a
few pitfalls.

I suggest you avail yourself of the opportunity to test ride a tadpole
trike with rear suspension on rough pavement, and compare it to your
current trike. However, this may end up costing you several thousand
dollars, when you buy your new suspended trike.


Actually, I am in the market for another ride. Can you give some
brands that are currently offering the rear suspension????