Although It would be fun to read all the argument's counter arguments
and
counter counter arguments put forward by professionals and try to come
to my
own unbiased decision although Unbiased would be difficult as I am
already
biased!! Im sticking with the argument

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

The best I could hope to do is go out and take some photo's of well
known
and well used mountain biker haunts and show the lack of soil damage.
but
mike would argue some way anyway so its kinda pointless.


That is more of what I was hinting at, Mike doesn't care about texts by
MTB'ers. It would have to be hard even for him to argue with photo
evidence. It is definately pointless unless you are having fun knowing
he is actually at home squirming, behind his "Internet tough guy" thing
he's always doing.


--
Mr_Kingkillaha