Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:02:32 -0800, cc wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:44:31 -0800, cc wrote:

I'm not talking about disparaging. When people find holes in the talk
or research, they ask a question about it. It happens all the time.
But not after my talk. NOT ONE person has ever found anything
questionable in my talk OR paper, either before, during, or after the
talk. I always ask questions or make comments if I think there is
something wrong with the research. So do other people. So my paper has
been peer-reviewed by HUNDREDS of scientists. And passed with flying
colors. You are just demonstrating that you haven't a clue about
scientific conferences.
Wrong answer, bucko. I am
intimately familiar with them.
No specifics, conveniently! A sure sign of a LIAR.
You read my specifics. You
just didn't un-der-stand them.
Moron.
" Wrong answer, bucko. I am intimately familiar with them."

Where do you see any specifics?
I don't need to tell you which
conferences I have attended or
spoken/presented at to make it
perfectly clear that I am
familiar with them.

Yes, you do, because there is otherwise no reason to believe you.
Mountain bikers are NOTORIOUSLY dishonest. After all, there's no way
that mountain biking can be justified while being truthful! There is
no good reason to allow bikes into natural areas.

No, I do not, and will not. I
have given you ample specifics
above. Anyone but you would be
satisfied, and you aren't only
because you've got your
fingers in your ears. Knowing
my name and the conferences
won't change anything.
Besides, do we have proof that
you even gave your talk, or
that anyone attended? Or that
you weren't lambasted at your
yearly public issuance of
hate-speak? That burden of
proof is still on you.