On 01/12/2019 15:58, JNugent wrote:
On 01/12/2019 14:53, TMS320 wrote:
On 01/12/2019 01:28, JNugent wrote:
On 30/11/2019 23:38, TMS320 wrote:
On 30/11/2019 18:53, MrCheerful wrote:
On 30/11/2019 14:44, colwyn wrote:
On 30/11/2019 14:04, JNugent wrote:

And this was one of a relatively few posts in uk.r.c to
be on-topic?

Oh yes, just tinged with gloating, glee and schadenfreude.
Shame on you!

If enough cyclists get the message then the number of deaths
may decrease.

The message? How about people that know nothing about riding a
bike stop jumping to conclusions and mind their own business?

Is "Watch where you're going" jumping to conclusions?

I think it is reasonable to assume that not looking was a factor.
Pronouncing the cause of not looking is jumping to conclusions.

You are surely being a bit hasty in claiming it must have been
suicide.

Eh?

No, the only reasonable conclusion is that the collision was not
intended and that it happened because the cyclist wasn't looking
where he was going.

You should make an effort to read and comprehend what others write.

It isn't as though it's the only example we've ever seen, is it?

It happens. Fortunately not as much as your inability to read.

Besides, the message "look where you're going" is stating the
bleedin' obvious, unnecessary and patronising.

It is obvious. I agree.

It is not unnecessary -

Wrong. Patronising stuff snipped.