Krygowski's "polished talking points" are politics, not truth
On Sep 6, 4:54*am, Andre Jute wrote:
On Sep 5, 7:29*pm, Dan O wrote:
On Sep 5, 8:55 am, Frank Krygowski wrote:
snip
*You don't know so much as you think you do.
This is some serious knee-jerk adversarialism you're locked into.
Just because you've stuffed a big bag full of data and polished (and
polished, and polished) a bunch of talking points doesn't make you
right or anyone else wrong.
Anyone with "polished (and polished, and polished) [...] talking
points" is an obsessed apparatchik who *needs* to polish those
received "talking points" because he can't think for himself.
You know, I've heard it said "You can't polish ****." The Myth
Busters tried, but they weren't very successful.
JS.
|