On 17/11/2010 10:40, ash wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:25 am, wrote:
On 17 nov, 11:16, wrote:





On Nov 17, 9:37 am, wrote:

On Nov 17, 9:10 am, wrote:

Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_...

I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed.
Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are
killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

Er Doug - a toddler cannot be held accountable for their actions due
to them being below the age od criminal responsibility. They need
protecting from those who should klnow better but insist on invading
invade the safe environment of a pavement in their selfish and illegal
desire to cycle where they like.

The proposition from the EU (and the law in a number of European
countries such as Holland) has nothing to do with criminal
responsibility nor even accountability.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Cyclists who as a group who are by far the biggest law breakers on the
roads& pavements

Do you have figures to back this up?