On 10/09/2020 08:12, TMS320 wrote:

On 10/09/2020 00:52, JNugent wrote:
On 08/09/2020 21:05, Simon Mason wrote:
On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 at 8:55:36 PM UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:

It doesn't look like "just an accident" or being careless.
Perhaps bonkers speeding ought to be treated as a deliberate
action, just like a cyclist deliberately using a bike without a
front brake. The sentence really does look lenient.

The moron driver even had his toddler son in the car when he
crashed into the tree.

Does that not indicate a lack of intent to crash into anything?

Only a very stupid person would say "No" in answer to that.

Only an incredidibly stupid person could add that last sentence.

Hardly.

You are the person who claimed that the crash had either been deliberate
or should be treated as though it had been deliberate, aren't you?

The best that can be said for you is that when you made that
astoundingly stupid claim (even by your standards), you didn't know
about the "toddler son" reportedly in the car at the time of the accident.

Some of us didn't need such extra evidence to seriously doubt any
(stupid) assertion that the crash happened as a wilful act on the part
of the driver.