On 16/09/2020 22:52, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/09/2020 21:00, JNugent wrote:
On 16/09/2020 20:50, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/09/2020 20:41, JNugent wrote:
On 16/09/2020 19:08, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/09/2020 11:35, JNugent wrote:

You (and certain others hereabouts) need to stop bandying words
about and start understanding the law and the issues.

This is not a cycling group,

No, I haven't thought so for a long time, either.

not a legal one so there is no need whatsoever to restrict words to
legal definitions.

If you are keen to see convictions for dangerous driving, you need
to realise that that is a legal matter.

I vote for this to be entered for stupid comment of the year.

Hardly.

Oh yes.

You didn't even *know* that "dangerous driving" is a legal construct,
hence your disinclination to think of it in a legal context.

The law does not have a monopoly on particular words.

You complained of there being few convictions for dangerous driving.

Then you try to say that you didn't mean that in a legal sense.

What, pray, is a non-legal conviction of a crime?