View Single Post
  #13  
Old November 7th 04, 08:45 PM
Steve
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 11/7/04 8:12 AM, in article , "Tom Sherman"
wrote:

Tom Kunich wrote:

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...

wrote:

Less than one-third of the eligible voters chose Bush II. The real winner,
chosen by 40% of the eligible voters was "none of the above".



Good, then you DO have a citation to back up that preposterous claim?


Bush II received approximately one-half of the vote of the approximately
60% [1] of the eligible voters who voted. That is approximately 30% of
the eligible voters choosing Bush II, or less than one-third.

40% did not choose either Kerry or Bush II, thereby indicating their
preference for "none of the above".

[1] http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/11/03/voter.turnout.ap/.


You made an EXPLICIT statement with no proof to back it up.
This logical conclusion of yours is IMPLICIT and is based more on apathy for
politics, indifference or even laziness!

There was no "write-in" choice for None of the above.....

Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home