On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:28:39 GMT, (Bill Z.)
wrote:

The author is a reporter, and most reporters who quote a source as
prominently as he did got that "source" to explain it to him. I've
had numerous "discussions" with Burdett and would not trust anything
he said about bicycles helmets - he is very biased.

The author is Carlton Reid, editor of Bicycle Business magazine, a
leading bike trade journal. He is a cyclist, and as a journalist
specialises almost exclusively in cycling. He is strongly pro-helmet.

You lose, sucker.

Oh, and I'm flushing Guy's reply to your post unread. I've more
important things to do than to respond to each post that moron sends
out.

Translation: "Laa laa, I'm not listening". Or reading, apparently.

An unusually worthless piece of input from Zaumen, really; nothing to
say about either the study or the article. Why not just post "I hate
Burdett" and be done with it, Bill? That way at least you won't look
like a complete idiot by trying to defend your irrational refusal to
read a story in a trade mag simply because it quotes someone you
disagree with on religious grounds.

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at CHS, Puget Sound