Sherman's Ever-changing Subjects (AKA Thread Titles)
On Mar 13, 8:23 pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
"Tēm ShermĒn °_°" wrote in ...
On 3/12/2011 9:29 PM, Bill Sornson wrote:
"Tēm ShermĒn °_°" wrote in message
...
On 3/6/2011 11:13 AM, Dan 0vermĒn wrote:
[...]
We once talked about how much body weight goes into the handlebars. I
said most weight should go into the pedals, but that it was one of
those super-complex dynamic things.
Now it occurs to me that there's one time - at the top of each stroke,
when weight must come off to switch to the other pedal.[...]
The handlebars should carry the weight of the lower arms and hands only..
The rest of the rider's weight should be on the seat, with a
significant portion being carried by the seat back.
--
Tēm ShermĒn - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.
***
Just curious, Tom. A number of your "reply posts" appear as new
threads, with no "Re." in the Subject field.
Any idea why?
Because I update thread titles to match the subject when thread drift
occurs. However, many programs will still recognize previous posts in
the thread, e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird provides a "references" line in the
header, where the previous posts up-thread are numbered, and can be
accessed simply by clicking on the number.
Bill "we won't mention my rogue question mark and lack of quoting" S.
Or Micro$oft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3502.922 *not* recognizing the
signature separator, i.e " --". It seems Micro$oft is too arrogant to
follow established protocols.
****************
Hey, the remnant question mark seems to be gone, at least. No idea why
they'd CHANGE the '' quoting convention, which worked fine in LiveMail
until the 2011 "upgrade".
I still think you should indicate that you're /replying/ to content in the
Subject field, even if resorting to the ol' "Was: Tibetan Monkey Spams
Newsgroups Relentlessly" (for example) shtick.
Bill "no sweat off my mousebutt; I barely check in here nowadays" S.
Anything that lets you type in the message body ought to let you
insert quote delimiters.
|