Mark wrote:
"saki" wrote in message
...

Montesquiou wrote in :


The U.S. business magazine Forbes is reporting that Landis' lawyer did in
fact request a test for sample B:

http://www.forbes.com/entrepreneurs/...ap2916504.html


Yes, but according to this the UCI requested it Sunday night in order to
avoid the result getting delayed by vacation:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...-23218,00.html



If the lawyer wants to attack the reliability of the test, then
stretching out the interval between the A and B samples tests is a good
way to go. That's why in the Hamilton case, as it turned out, all the
continuances were on Tyler's side. For those testosterone positives,
most of the successful appeals have been on technicalities/procedural
grounds.