On 08/05/18 20:01, TMS320 wrote:
On 08/05/18 14:05, JNugent wrote:

Sensible people are well aware that the liklihood of the cyclist being
blameless and the elderly victim blameworthy (which is what you
believe) to be very low indeed.

That paragraph is essentially correct.

I should add, if the part in brackets is removed. What makes you think
you know what I believe? I recently related an event about a pedestrian
that had to step back and *you* defended the driver.