Thread: Andrew
View Single Post
  #74  
Old August 14th 19, 06:57 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tom Kunich[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,231
Default Andrew

On Wednesday, August 14, 2019 at 10:39:03 AM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:06:02 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 10:00:55 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 03:49:13 -0000 (UTC), news18
wrote:

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:42:24 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 9:00:51 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:27:11 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

Darwin's theory is so unlikely given the mathematics behind it (which
was known AT THE TIME OF DARWIN) that one has to wonder what would
ever have brought anyone to even give it a second thought.

The entire problem with your argument is that you seem to be under the
premise that all species are totally distinct and different from each
other. The mathematice changes when you start to group by similarities
and again when you start to examine common genetic code.

So you thing Dog made the sky blue!

Whoever would have guessed that a Zebra and a North American cougar
aren't the same species?

Funny,but a tree of life on my wall says they share a common ancestor..

Common Ancestor? Chimpanzees share from 98.9 - 99% of human DNA. In
addition they chare a reproduction cycle similar to that of humans,
with most reaching sexual maturity just before or during their teenage
years. They also have a gestation period for about 8 months.
--
cheers,

John B.


Do you EVER tire of being a fool? A DOG has 99% of the same genes as a human. However 1% of 30 Million is 300,000 sequences.

Mutations occur about 1 x 10^9 reproductions and mutations to somatic cells have no effect or are cancerous. Somatic cells are a single cell in the body and the immune system destroys them as a rule.

On a germ cell level, a single point mutation can be silent (having no effect), beneficial or it can have disastrous effects on the offspring the cell may produce, although even in these cases one often needs a mutated allele from both parents. Again each of these requires about 1 x 10^9 times reproductions.

I understand that you people do not have any even vague sense of time but for one single mutation to succeed without spontaneously aborting, (80% of all fertilized eggs spontaneously abort) requires CENTURIES.

Because you don't understand math you cannot even get a vague feel for just how impossible it is for natural selection to have any effect beyond minor improvement of a species for specific rolls. And these are not mutations but naturally occurring genes that are finally combines with a matching germ cell.

Tell us "news18" and John - why are you commenting on this as if you have even the vaguest understanding of biology? Neither of you have a footing in math let alone any sort of feeling for the magnitude of the problem.

Why don't you two tell us how smart you are again and then make more absolutely stupid comments? The difference between the gene sequence of plants and a human is only 74% difference. Gee that would only take 10 times the age of the Universe to mutate so you're in like Flin.


Well, I'd have to say that "telling us how smart you are again" is a
far superior act than demonstrating how ignorant you are, which you
are so adapt in doing.

But I obviously was mistaken in discussing the Chimp's 98.9 - 99% of
human DNA as quite obviously that couldn't apply to your good self.
After all the Chimp has hair on it's head and you don't.
--
cheers,

John B.


I haven't make a mention of how smart I am - it is more than enough to point out how you morons can't find your ass with both hands and love to demonstrate it to the public at large.
Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home