On 11/04/2018 15:25, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 12:42:23 GMT, TMS320 wrote:

On 11/04/18 10:54, MrCheerful wrote:
On 11/04/2018 10:31, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 23:39:12 GMT, MrCheerful
wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...t-riding-crawl
-ki lled-recruitment-agent.html

How many "another ones" have been killed by drivers in the months
since the last one?

It must be very disappointing for you when there is no suggestion of
law breaking or lack of care.

https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...tachment_data/
file/6

81593/quarterly-estimates-july-to-september-2017.pdf

KSI up = more careless drivers.

Did you read that before writing your comment?

Did you read the actual death figures; how many of them did you post a
report on to the motoring NG?


ksi reporting methods regarding severity have changed, so comparison
with previous years figures is impossible.

Killed is down 4 percent

5 deaths per billion miles travelled by motor traffic

distance travelled is not a releavant measure.

Completely irrelevant to pedestrians.

total casualties are down 5 per cent.

deaths. Not "accidents" Primarily due to better paramedic care.


motor traffic is up one percent.

Increased traffic and reduced casualties have gone together for nearly
50 years.


I do not post anything to motoring groups.

This is actually a cycling group.

I see that per billion miles travelled cyclists kill 5 times as many
pedestrians as motor traffic does.

Statistics tell a lot of things.