On 02/12/2019 11:42, TMS320 wrote:

On 02/12/2019 11:09, JNugent wrote:
On 02/12/2019 10:06, TMS320 wrote:
On 01/12/2019 20:58, JNugent wrote:
On 01/12/2019 18:19, TMS320 wrote:
On 01/12/2019 17:50, JNugent wrote:

You said: "Pronouncing the cause of not looking is jumping to
conclusions".

I did.

And that means that you prefer the only alternative,

And it means you still fail to understand the difference between
"cause of not looking" and "not looking was the cause". Perhaps your
first language isn't concerned about word order.

Perhaps you are not concerned about logic in language. Or perhaps
there's no "perhaps" about it.

Shrug.

Yes... almost at the very top... what does it say?
That's right... *uk.rec.cycling*
This is not the place to give advice to drivers.

Yes, and the casualties, mistakes and law breaking by drivers means
it is no place for drivers to give "advice" to cyclists.

On what basis do you "conclude" that?

Hypocracy is a sufficiently good word.

Certainly on no logical basis. Unless, of course, it's in the uk.r.c
charter. Is it?

No charter is required.

IOW: "Do as I say"?

If you post again it will get an uncivil reply. You have been warned.

Gerraway! TMS320 being "uncivil"?

You're not welcome in this group, now **** off.

I shall not.

I thought you said you were going to be uncivil?

You're just behaving like any old cyclist when the error of his ways are
pointed out.