On Jul 11, 11:58*am, Eldon wrote:
On Jul 11, 2:03*pm, f squared wrote:

And WTF does this have to do with Jean Mercer getting a license to
practice clinical psychology? Or did I mess something along the way?

Yes, you certainly did "mess something along the way" -- a great deal.
WTF does whether Jean Mercer is a clinical psychologist have to do
with the above URLs or the babbling you post here. It doesn't take a
psychologist to see the damage being done by the therapies she has
exposed and criticized. Jean has her PhD in developmental psychology
(a discipline that does not have licensure) and has far more knowledge
in this area than most clinical psychologists do. One doesn't have to
be a practicing psychologist to see the obvious harm being done by the
methods recommended in the links I gave so your obsession with Mercer
is nothing more than ad hominem that evades the real issue, which is
child torture in the name of the "therapy" you defend.

http://www.childrenintherapy.org/pro.../federici.html
http://www.childrenintherapy.org/pro.../randolph.html
http://www.childrenintherapy.org/pro.../feinberg.html
http://www.childrenintherapy.org/proponents/keck.html
http://www.childrenintherapy.org/proponents/thomas.html

But if you want to obsess about the license issue, Liz Randolph lost
her license to practice psychology back in 1996 and Nancy Thomas never
had one to begin with and neither of them have anything even close to
Jean Mercer's credentials. Feinberg has also repeatedly been in
trouble with his state board.