SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
On Feb 24, 3:18 pm, "Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote:

Cipale.bot wrote in message

...


numbnutz... she is smarter than you will ever be...


Her sort of "intelligence" is nothing I would ever hope to achieve.
What did she or you do other than state the patently obvious? But to
be fair, I would give her the benefit of the doubt when speaking for
herself -- after all, it is *you* that has represented her here.


Being married to you disproves that theory right off the bat.


{Laughs}


The wind-up for me was russell.bot writing:

"Of course, the fact is most people in the U.S. also support our form
"of quasi-socialism."

I've heard the same sort of comment many times before by a "certain
variety" of statists, and thus it is a more or less valid stereotype.
One would think that if "most people" were for it, then participation
would hardly need to be compulsory. But "they" insist that it must be
compulsory, and elect "representatives" to force participation under
threat of violence.

Which means, of course, that "they" are simply dishonest: socialists
are liars and worse yet, thieves. It can't be a simple problem of
ignorance. Okay,... I suppose naked stupidity could be an
explanation. It is a plausible explanation for chipale.bot, if not
for others.


Whatever.. good night child.