On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:50:37 -0800, sltom992 wrote:

On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 1:19:10 AM UTC-8, news18 wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:58:43 -0800, sltom992 wrote:

On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 8:47:57 AM UTC-8,
wrote:
On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 11:38:01 AM UTC-5,
wrote:

Hey dippy - I have flown over it in bombers at 5,000 ft. So shove
your "pictures" since I looked at it through open bomb bay doors.

What bombers that carried internal payloads flew over north vietnam
at 5000'? The only bombers the US used extensively in vietnam were
B-52's which generally dropped their payload in the 30,000' range.
it wasn't likely a b-52 (or any tactical bomber) would be flying at
5000' over hostile territory - that's well within range of a
shoulder-launched AAM in that era.

Even so, are you going to tell us you could discern the condition of
a road under a jungle canopy from 5000 feet away?

Not only are you smarter and more well-informed than anyone in this
forum, you also have super vision powers!

As John pointed out. Most of the Ho Chi Minh trail wasn't trails at
all but dirt roads.

Lol, the predictable Tommie side shuffle.

what has me wondering that since Vietnam has mountains to 10,000 feet
and Cambodia to 6,000 feet, what was Tommie doing at 5,000? looking for
rock filled clouds?

I was flying in B52's. What were you doing? What service did you ever
attempt to get in?

err, isn't this the one that stayed at 30,000 feet?

I applied but timing was off as the war was winding up. Before that I was
in the high school cadet program. I've also been in volunteer rural fire
service and volunteer state emergency service, but my main service
activity in life was running bicycle rides/tour to encourage people to
ride bicycles.


None, because losers will always be losers.

Well apart from getting that wrong, you certainly are. Something about
protesting too much comes to mind Tommie.