On 13/09/2017 21:20, Simon Jester wrote:
On Wednesday, September 13, 2017 at 8:58:58 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:

Happily a woman has the incident on camera, and there must be plenty of
cameras in that area in any case, so the cyclist may be vindicated yet,
but not on the other charges he faces.

So you agree the cyclist is innocent until proven guilty and the pedestrian could have mitigated her head injury by wearing a helmet.

Mr C had failed to take account of a highly significant part of the news
report. The lady victim was crossing a road into which the turd on a
bike was turning.

I'm sure I don't need to tell you what that means.