Squashme wrote:
On 17 Aug, 19:22, nully wrote:
David Hansen wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:44:46 +0100 someone who may be nully
wrote this:-
Anyone have a means of contacting Ms Wilkins? I'd like to send her a
walking stick and some advice about shoving it in the wheel spokes of
dangerous, aggressive, and malicious cyclists like yourself and the
person she recently met. I'm told it meets with the most *spectacular*
results!
You advocate responding to an incident in which a dog was scared
with an action which could well lead to the death of a human.
Dont like the time, dont do the crime. Hmmmm, that seems to fit nicely.
By the way, where did you get "scared" from? The article said that the
dog was *hit*.

Yeaahhh, and what people here are forgetting is that basically the dog
owner had paid for a licence, so the dog had a right to be on the
path, which it had paid for unlike the so-called "cyclist". Oh no,
wait, I mean ...

C'mon, get off your hobby horse and take a grip for a moment. This is a
*dog*, remember? Not an inanimate bike, a living *creature*. You
*really* think you dont have a responsibility to stop if you
accidentally hit it, regardless of whether it was the bloody dogs fault
or not?