View Single Post
  #10  
Old December 23rd 12, 02:24 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.net.news.moderation
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default Absurd urcm decision

On 23/12/2012 14:19, michael adams wrote:

wrote:
Bertie Wooster wrote:


Why should I be barred from responding to his polite and reasonable
question in the moderated group?


You aren't.


His question did not appear in the group; therefore an attempt
to reply is a nullity. This issue has been previously dealt
with: a quote from a rejected post was itself grounds for
rejection, and rightfully so; and I think you know that -
otherwise you would have submitted a post with your reply to
the quote you obtained by assiduously scanning the logs
until you found something with which you could continue your
group-wrecking activities.


Hello there Peter. Your third ever post on Usenet and all on
this group. But this time with the colons.


What is it with some poster(s) and colons ?

But there again, a change is as good as a rest, I suppose.


michael adams


I see only one colon in his contribution (not including those placed
automatically by the attribution).

Did you mean semi-colons (the punctuation mark which time had almost
forgotten)?
Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home