View Single Post
  #54  
Old June 29th 06, 05:53 PM posted to alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.bicycles.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups


"Edward Dolan" wrote in message
...


"ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
"regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
"impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence
shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife
and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning
any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and
all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas.
Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of
"librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books?

Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
to his posts.

Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
from reading or responding to any other post.
Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.


Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.


Really...? Then I would suggest you drop it. After all, you spread the
Vandy topic into other realms of rec/alt bicycles. You have continued the
topic with silly accusations and your own attempts to draw attention away
from your cross-posting disaster.

You are merely extending the topic so you can continue to claim it is
someone else's fault. If you want to post on point concerning the opinions
of MV, have at it. Otherwise, this thread is dead. The same "argument" in
several spots. Beyond meaningless.

Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that best
describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the
sorrowfully miniscule.



You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
stalker too.


Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
am Greater than I really am.


I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and
a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
charging you something for my services.
[...]

I don't have any monopoly money.

This thread is dead. The same "argument" in several spots. Beyond
meaningless.
Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that best
describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the
sorrowfully miniscule.




Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home