On 04/05/18 23:12, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 5:08:09 PM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:

I pointed out that it was a
pedestrian crossing, not a cycling crossing, he failed to counter by
saying that there was a cycle path leading to the crossing, I pointed
out again that he should push his bicycle over the crossing and that
there was no cycle path where he was crossing to.

What law was the cyclist breaking?

The moronists are confused. They think "do not" means "MUST NOT". Rule 79.