No-one really threatened you with homicide either ... so stop pretending that they did !

"I will rip your head off and crush it with my bike". Your lies are SOOO easy to refute!

Oh yes ? The legal offense is actually one of 'Coercion' ... you have not been coerced to do anything that you might otherwise have done nor refrain from doing something to which you are legally entitled. You are NOT legally entitled to lay hands on (assault) this individual. If you don't believe me take it to the police ... they take real death threats very seriously.

And, as ever, you resort to accusing everyone of lying. Where ? Idiot.

Second, you have no idea what actually happened (I do, since I was there), so you are LYING when you pretend to know. That's nothing new for mountain bikers. "Liar" is their middle name. You prove that every single time you open your mouth. What's a mystery is why you keep doing it, no matter how many times you are refuted and shown to be a fool. Are you a masochist, too?

Well, since you posted probably rather more than you intended in a parallel thread a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.mountain-bike/g6-looFBysM/nYQ7Q36X8akJ" Here /a I guess you might want to reconsider your statement. You provided prima facie evidence of your own guilt !



BS. Refuted again. Without specifics, we must assume you are bluffing. AGAIN.

The specifics are in the other thread, which I have referenced, where is your refutation ? "BS" is not a refutation.

For a supposedly smart guy skilled in maths and logic you fail on the most basic of logical operands.

Since this doesn't usually suffice for anyone else I would hesitate to claim victory so presumptiously. Perhaps we should invite votes as to the outcome ... or, perhaps, appoint a jury to adjudge the result ???? :-) :-)

Oh, no, sorry, forgot that you don't believe in juries ... unless they produce the result you want !

Liar. You now stoop to pure fantasy. NO judge or jury can be accurate, since they really don't know the facts. But you (and everyone else) already knew that, liar.

Where is the lie Mike ? I am simply pointing out that whilst you might claim victory in your own mind I strongly suspect that an impartial group viewing this thread might not agree with that. Didn't realise you were so touchy about the word 'jury' :-)

Your approach to debate appears to be ... throw out ludicrous proposition .... provide zero back-up beyond 'I say so' when challenged ... then claim victory in the subsequent debate irrespective of having your head handed to you on a plate.