View Single Post
  #2  
Old September 27th 05, 11:24 PM
G.T.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Does it really save any energy?


"(PeteCresswell)" wrote in message
...
Marzocchi's ETA feature lets the rider lower a 100mm fork by about an inch

and
reduce the travel to an inch.

I'm not sure whether the claimed benefit is change in bike attitude, less

energy
absorbed by bobbing, or both.


But thinking about the bogging aspect, it seems like it might be a matter

of
longer travel through less resistance vs shorter travel through greater
resistance. If that's true maybe the energy absorbed is a wash.


Two different things here. First, with the fork compressed enough and a
steady pedaling motion there will be no movement so no energy loss. Second,
the difference in resistance between the two is minimal, the damping
characteristics aren't that different at the two the levels and the spring
rate is the same, just preloaded.

Greg



Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home