"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:58:22 GMT, "JP"
wrote:
.
.Dear Mike,
.
.1) Your hypotheses are flawed, your sources are not scientific, your
.conclusions are invalid.
.2) Your alleged PhD is fictitious.
.3) As defined by your standard footer you are wholly ineffective, a
joke
.actually.
.4) The responses you get here is the only recognition you get in your
.life.
.
.Let me guess. Unemployed, living with parents, no adult relationships,
.right hand is your best buddy.

Did you say something?

Yes he did, let me spell it out for you. He suggested that you are a
w@nker, he's probably not alone in that assumption.