On Jul 11, 7:28*pm, John Dorsay wrote:
Eldon wrote:
On Jul 11, 2:03 pm, f squared wrote:
Saifee Durbar has a vision for Africa.
He plans to build a railway linking Africa’s west coast (Cameroon)
with the east coast (Sudan).
The railroad will go through the Central African Republic. The
minerals there will be used to build part of the railroad-the
beginning of the long road to self sufficiency!
Saif Durbar has worked it all out, and intends to do it in such a way
as to improve the situation in Darfur as much as possible.
For more information…
http://saifdurbar.wordpress.com/
http://saifeedurbar.wordpress.com/
And WTF does this have to do with Jean Mercer getting a license to
practice clinical psychology? Or did I mess something along the way?
Jean Mercer doesn't practice clinical psychology. *Yet the
cyberstalking kook expects people to believe that her lack of an
irrelevant license somehow invalidates her criticism of the abusive
*pseudoscientific "therapies" promoted and/or practiced by people
such as Ronald S. Federici, Elizabeth M. Randolph, Neil I. Feinberg,
Gregory C. Keck, and Nancy L. Thomas and described on web pages such
as these:
http://www.childrenintherapy.org/pro...ts/thomas.html
There's no accounting for kooks.
BTW, if you actually did spend any time investigating the kook's
posting history (not sure if you really were doing so or if you were
just having fun twisting the kook's tail), you will have noticed
that the kook might be either a certain international adoption
consultant coughRonald S. Federici/cough or one of his close
collaborators/supporters.
The first link in my sig certainly points in that direction, but
there is other, more amusing, evidence as well.
Like several long-timers here, I have things set up so I can
datamine the news feed for ars quite painlessly. *In particular, I
can - and sometimes do - correlate ip addresses, net blocks, and
other header information such as google account hashes from the last
few years' worth of posts.
When I crunched the cyberstalking kook's google account hashes,
there were a couple of noteworthy bits of data that emerged.
Some might find it interesting that most of the cyberstalking kook's
*posts came through the same tor and other proxies that are also
used by a *particular prolific contributor to ars. *The specific
proxies' appearances on ars are almost exclusively limited to the
cyberstalking kook and BS. *Otherwise, there are fewer than a dozen
posts through any of the kook's ip addresses. (note to Barbara if
you happen to read this post: *I know you have nothing to do with
the cyberstalking kook and I understand that you do not use proxies
to conceal your identity.)
I was especially amused to note that the cyberstalking kook is not
only cyberstalking and kooky, but he is also *stupid* when it comes
to understanding the medium he is flooding with his spam. *He made
five posts to ars *before* he discovered proxies (snicker). *All of
those came from DC/VA ip addresses. *By some strange coincidence, it
happens that a certain international adoption consultant
coughRonald S. Federici/cough is based in VA.
If you wish to taunt^w present the cyberstalking kook with that
evidence of its ineptitude, I can post the details of the ip addresses.
Oh yes, please do that. I don't have the patience for these espionage
games, but I sure admire those who do.
Hey, maybe you, Moniica and I should just tackle Dr. Federici and
mash him into the floor, screaming abuse at him until he either
confesses or suffocates. What sort of therapy do you think we should
call it?
I do hope that we haven't damaged the chew toy with excessive play.
*Post-only spammers like the circle-jerkers are no fun at all. *I
hope the cyberstalking kook gets interactive again. *If I'm *really*
lucky he'll decide to "discredit" me, too.
John
--
Why is the coughanonymous/cough cyberstalker posting as
(http://tinyurl.com/mlopgl)
(http://tinyurl.com/ntx742)
(http://tinyurl.com/n4aj72)
(http://tinyurl.com/lutsrq)
(http://tinyurl.com/l8pvqz)
(http://tinyurl.com/l3ej9v)
(http://tinyurl.com/n44r8v)
(http://tinyurl.com/ntofx6)
(http://tinyurl.com/ne9on4)
(http://tinyurl.com/lvhcsk)
(http://tinyurl.com/mxmzs7)
(http://tinyurl.com/l9aqmp)
(http://tinyurl.com/ncdf5t)
(http://tinyurl.com/ll799u)
trying so hard to discredit Monica Pignotti and other critics of
the abusive "treatment" called "Attachment Therapy"?
Why doesn't he direct people to the American Psychological
Association Division 37 Task Force position paper athttp://www.apa.org/divisions/div37/RADTaskForceManuscript.pdf
instead?