Absurd urcm decision
Bertie Wooster wrote:
Why should I be barred from responding to his polite and reasonable
question in the moderated group?
You aren't.
His question did not appear in the group; therefore an attempt to reply
is a nullity. This issue has been previously dealt with: a quote from a
rejected post was itself grounds for rejection, and rightfully so; and I
think you know that - otherwise you would have submitted a post with
your reply to the quote you obtained by assiduously scanning the logs
until you found something with which you could continue your
group-wrecking activities.
--
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed to be worth at
least what you paid for them.
|