On May 16, 9:01*am, Fred Flintstein
wrote:
On 5/15/2011 5:24 PM, Fredmaster of Brainerd wrote:

It would be a little more revealing to compare to UCI points
since a non-GC rider can have a good Tour, winning stages
etc, and still be somewhere in the middle on GC.

A lot more revealing would be to have this data by medical
adviser. That's the one variable that is unaccounted for.

This is a great marketing tool for the people that are
the furthest ahead of the testing. I'll bet that isn't how
it was intended.

Fred Flintstein

Dumbass. What's needed is a neural network diagram that shows Lance
at the center and the connections to doping. Popo is a good example
of 1 hop.