On Jun 17, 2:58 pm, Donald Munro wrote:
ronaldo_jeremiah wrote:
Though Carl did not label it as such, he has masterfully
applied the Kunich Korrection (KK). In this case:

KK = 120/180 = 67%.

This is a good starting value for quantitative TK posts, though it may
represent an upper bound. When given results are still implausible
using KK = 67%, KK's equivalent to 50%, 33%, or even 8% may be
appropriate. Further refinement of quantitative KK is necessary.

Perhaps you need to add some Katastrophe theory to improve the
approximation.

I believe you meant to write KAOS theory.
I hadn't noticed the resemblence, but it's unmistakable.

http://www.berniekopell.com/photos/4.html
http://www.kenpapai.com/cycling/rbr/Tomk.JPG

R