View Single Post
  #145  
Old June 18th 19, 12:20 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
John B. Slocomb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 547
Default Protecting yourself

On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 06:55:03 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Sunday, June 16, 2019 at 7:08:46 PM UTC-7, John B. Slocomb wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 17:37:48 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Sunday, June 16, 2019 at 6:18:10 AM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:31:28 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

Snipped all prior irrelevant stuff to Tom's polly waffle.

I am not "alone". Even using the figures from NASA and NOAA 46% of
scientists deny that there could be any warming beyond natural climatic
variability. When you actually look into it NASA and NOAA have actually
counterfeited the records. They had a problem in that the Weather
Satellite temperature readings from 1978 onwards didn't show any heating
and Dr Roy Spencer, the original science manager of the weather
satellite program, finally resigned when he could no longer stand the
blatant lies of the NASA and NOAA climate divisions. He expressed the
belief that these two would very soon begin counterfeiting the satellite
records to match their computer models and that is now exactly what they
have been doing.


Interesting statement as his blog actually says " Dr. Spencer's work
with NASA continues as the U.S. Science Team leader for the Advanced
Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite."

I find it strange that he would make that claim on his blog if he had
resigned.

As for Global Warming, his blog, statement titled "Global Warming
Natural or Man Made" doesn't deny that global warming is occurring. He
simply argues the cause(s). Quite the opposite in fact as he documents
earth temperatures for about 2000 years in another article titled
"2,000 Years of Global Temperatures" that shows a fairly steady
increase in the earths temperature from about 1600. In "Latest Global
Temps" he shows a chart taken from NASA satellites that shows a steady
increase in average temperatures from 1979 to present.
--

Cheers,

John B.


I didn't say he had that on hid blog. He said that before Congress. Furthermore he is forced to work within the parameters of the data he can get. That shows it to be warming when it isn't.

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...04&FORM=VI RE



His blog also states that "Dr. Spencer's research has been entirely
supported by U.S. government agencies: NASA, NOAA, and DOE."

You mean that he takes money from an agency that he resigned for in
horror for falsifying data? That doesn't sound like he is a very
ethical person, does it?

--

Cheers,

John B.
Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home